Missing partial password chunk in LM cracking
#14
(02-10-2012, 03:35 PM)mastercracker Wrote: 1) When you do the --show, having the ability to do also --remove for the fully cracked hash would be great.

already implemented! opposite of --show is --left

(02-10-2012, 03:35 PM)mastercracker Wrote: 2) Right now, the output with --show is on screen and can be redirected to a file using ">" but it would be more natural with the -o switch. I tried it, it does not bug -plus but does not do anything.

OK, please add to wiki

(02-10-2012, 03:35 PM)mastercracker Wrote: 3) The uncracked part is shown as ******* right now. It does the job but does not discriminate with an actual ******* value since it's also 7 characters long. That's why, I was suggesting something like <not found> because you cannot mistaken it with an actual value since it's in lowercase and it's more than 7 characters long. While at it, a special code could be useful for space characters (since you don't see it especially if it is at the end of the password. I currently don't have a solution for this but we need to think about it.

OK, please add to wiki

Quote:4) It would be great to have a routine that checks the .pot file at the beginning so that there is no time wasted recracking the same hash (halves) over and over. For example let's say that for 50 full LM hash (100 halves unique or not), 99 were already cracked in the past, only 1 hash would be left to searched. So as soon as it is cracked, the attack finishes and you don't have to go through the rest of the attacks keyspace.

no, i dont like that idea. imagine your hashcat.pot becomes 8gb big with time, hashcat would need to load and sort it each time. instead of this you could run hashcat with --left (from section 1) and overwrite the hashfile and then start with usual work



Messages In This Thread
RE: Missing partial password chunk in LM cracking - by atom - 02-10-2012, 04:01 PM
RE: LM hash support for OCLHC - by chort - 02-07-2012, 09:50 AM