Posts: 2
Threads: 1
Joined: Jun 2017
Hi All,
I have more than one cracking rig, and I want to distribute the cracking load in these rigs. whats the best way or tool to do this ?
Thanks
Posts: 32
Threads: 2
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 2
Threads: 1
Joined: Jun 2017
07-01-2017, 10:47 PM
(This post was last modified: 07-01-2017, 10:49 PM by nextnext.)
(06-20-2017, 04:08 AM)winxp5421 Wrote: https://github.com/s3inlc/hashtopussy/
Read, learn, love.
Thanks alot for sharing this.
but I saw a software called HashView , now it has a beta version (0.7) that support distributed cracking. it has many amazing feature such as (users,reporting,pausing the cracking to continue later,queuing, nice gui,..)
https://github.com/hashview/hashview/tree/0.7-beta
and the amazing Casey (one of hashView developer) has posted that he achieved 1 TH/s ! using multiple cracking systems.
https://twitter.com/CaseyCammilleri/stat...3508339712
did any one tried it ? and what do you think about it ?
Posts: 2,936
Threads: 12
Joined: May 2012
The hardware and underlying software are primarily responsible for speed. The wrapper's role with regards to speed is fairly minimal, in that it needs to perform efficiently to minimize the overheard associated with distributing work. The wrapper can't just magically pull 1 TH on its own, the hardware in the cluster and the backend software have to already be capable of achieving those numbers; the wrapper's job is to not fuck it up and kill performance with too much overhead. Without knowing the hardware in the cluster or the attack ran, we have no way of knowing how efficient the wrapper is. Therefore claiming it is capable of achieving some number is meaninglessness.
Also 1 TH isn't really that spectacular. We've built Hashcat clusters that achieve over 6.5 TH @ 99.2% efficiency.
Posts: 194
Threads: 7
Joined: Jul 2015
07-02-2017, 03:45 PM
(This post was last modified: 07-02-2017, 03:46 PM by soxrok2212.)
Well winxp, looks like you have a little competition
Hashview looks very nice, but I can't actually comment on the functionality or responsiveness of the UI.
epixoip, 6.5TH at 99.2% efficiency are some really crazy numbers.
Posts: 2,936
Threads: 12
Joined: May 2012
(07-02-2017, 03:45 PM)soxrok2212 Wrote: epixoip, 6.5TH at 99.2% efficiency are some really crazy numbers.
Hashstack - It's Hashcat on Catnip!™
Posts: 194
Threads: 7
Joined: Jul 2015
(07-02-2017, 07:44 PM)epixoip Wrote: (07-02-2017, 03:45 PM)soxrok2212 Wrote: epixoip, 6.5TH at 99.2% efficiency are some really crazy numbers.
Hashstack - It's Hashcat on Catnip!™
Not to bring it off topic, but I'm also hoping to see how shitty Vega performs in hashcat benchmarks
Posts: 32
Threads: 2
Joined: May 2017
(07-02-2017, 12:39 PM)epixoip Wrote: The hardware and underlying software are primarily responsible for speed. The wrapper's role with regards to speed is fairly minimal, in that it needs to perform efficiently to minimize the overheard associated with distributing work. The wrapper can't just magically pull 1 TH on its own, the hardware in the cluster and the backend software have to already be capable of achieving those numbers; the wrapper's job is to not fuck it up and kill performance with too much overhead. Without knowing the hardware in the cluster or the attack ran, we have no way of knowing how efficient the wrapper is. Therefore claiming it is capable of achieving some number is meaninglessness.
Also 1 TH isn't really that spectacular. We've built Hashcat clusters that achieve over 6.5 TH @ 99.2% efficiency.
Very impressive results there. Out of interest what hash algorithm / hash type was that result attained with?
Posts: 32
Threads: 2
Joined: May 2017
07-16-2017, 03:50 AM
(This post was last modified: 07-16-2017, 09:11 AM by kjs.)
(07-02-2017, 10:08 PM)soxrok2212 Wrote: (07-02-2017, 07:44 PM)epixoip Wrote: (07-02-2017, 03:45 PM)soxrok2212 Wrote: epixoip, 6.5TH at 99.2% efficiency are some really crazy numbers.
Hashstack - It's Hashcat on Catnip!™
Not to bring it off topic, but I'm also hoping to see how shitty Vega performs in hashcat benchmarks
I'll have my Vega cards here in a few days and will post benchmarks ASAP thereafter.
I have AMD Vega air cooled and liquid cooled versions coming. Not exactly expecting anything great but we will see.
Posts: 2,936
Threads: 12
Joined: May 2012
07-16-2017, 06:29 AM
(This post was last modified: 07-16-2017, 06:30 AM by epixoip.)
Single hash NTLM brute force. We usually use NTLM when advertising cluster speeds since it's most relevant to pentesters & blue teams.