Posts: 3
Threads: 1
Joined: Jan 2013
When you add more dictionaries x100 files to 80 MB, oclHashcat-plus not start brute. Maximum dictionary 14. When adding 14 dictionaries for 1GB, oclHashcat-plus falls with error ERROR: cuMemcpyDtoH () 999. Please fix.
GUI: v0.25
oclHashcat-plus64.exe
OS: Windows 7 x64
GP: x3 - Nvidia 660ti
Driver: 310.90
Thanks
Posts: 723
Threads: 85
Joined: Apr 2011
(01-26-2013, 08:55 PM)James1 Wrote: When you add more dictionaries x100 files to 80 MB, oclHashcat-plus not start brute. Maximum dictionary 14. When adding 14 dictionaries for 1GB, oclHashcat-plus falls with error ERROR: cuMemcpyDtoH () 999. Please fix.
GUI: v0.25
oclHashcat-plus64.exe
OS: Windows 7 x64
GP: x3 - Nvidia 660ti
Driver: 310.90
Thanks
can I just check something with you please ?
On Blandy's site you say this...
Quote:When you add more dictionaries x100 files to 80 MB, hashcat not start brute. Maximum dictionary 14. When adding 14 dictionaries for 1GB, hashcat falls with error ERROR: cuMemcpyDtoH () 999. Please fix.
You are saying here that it is oclhashcat-plus which has this problem for you.
Can you please confirm which is which ?
Thanks.
Posts: 3
Threads: 1
Joined: Jan 2013
Sorry. This is really oclHashcat-plus v0.12. When the dictionary more x100 program opens and immediately closes. When the dictionary for x14 1GB begins brute, and after a few minutes the error falls cuMemcpyDtoH () 999
Posts: 723
Threads: 85
Joined: Apr 2011
(01-26-2013, 09:20 PM)James1 Wrote: Sorry. This is really oclHashcat-plus v0.12. When the dictionary more x100 program opens and immediately closes. When the dictionary for x14 1GB begins brute, and after a few minutes the error falls cuMemcpyDtoH () 999
Thank you for confirming that you meant oclhashcat-plus.
I see your new
ticket, thanks for taking the time to report it. I am sure atom will reply to it soon.
Slightly off-topic but is having so many dictionaries a good idea ? Unless you have very carefully separated them I suspect you may be checking my 1000's of duplicate passwords.
If you don't have a specific reason for the separation, I suggest you merge a few of them and remove the duplicates and so save yourself a lot of cracking time.
Posts: 5,185
Threads: 230
Joined: Apr 2010
That one is already known and fixed. Thanks!