Mastercracker, ![[Image: good.gif]](http://forum.insidepro.com/images/smiles/good.gif)
That really imitates single dictionary attack, however, it's slower than hashcat because it only "replaces" the needed word once, the other 94 combinations could just be irrelevant to the needed hash(es).
Of course, you can increase the speed by removing 32 symbols from -1 charset, maybe even all upperalpha.
That really imitates single dictionary attack, however, it's slower than hashcat because it only "replaces" the needed word once, the other 94 combinations could just be irrelevant to the needed hash(es).
Of course, you can increase the speed by removing 32 symbols from -1 charset, maybe even all upperalpha.