03-02-2016, 04:53 AM
At first one would ask why not use option q or r in mask processor?
But you want to apply q, r rule on the Upper case and Special sign only, not all parts of the PW... Very nice trick.
I would put in that what you point here is result of a RegEx filter where your upper case letters [A-z], and special signs !"£$%^&*()@~:;{}[]+-_ <>,.?/|\ should float around the length of your password combis, BUT they can only appears exactly ONCE. The rest of the combi you want to have digits or lower case characters and you also want
1/ it does not matter how many time they occur or
2/ they can sequentially repeat as the rest length allowed
So you look out for something like this filter
[A-Z\!\"\£\$\%\^\&\*\(\)\@\~\:\;\{\}\[\]\+\-\_\ \<\>\,\.\?\/\|\\]\x{x,y}
or something of similar syntax( [...]\x{..})
In words: "matched" if anything matched A-Z or these special sign they can appear only once (But your PW combis consist of ?as so that u and ial sign appear exact once, while the digit or lower appear as they will be pleased
good matchhed
@aabcAa1; @atomAa1 is good
@aa@cAa1 is bad
@aabcAA1 is bad
@!"£$%^Y no one wants
You thought about extensions like
"must have also lower
must use at least (or exact!) one digit ...."
Google Key word is PW policy
RegEx (regular expression) is your key.
Few years ago somewhere I already came across more than 90 pre-formulated filters what you like could already be there.
@Szulik
"BF 12 chars pasword with ?a is almost all time "unpractical" unless You got 100% sure for password complex policy"
No. Because you don't want to see the way he see it, you think about time and use power force to BF.
Try it with 4 or 5 or 6 character/digit/signs PW combis only you will see what he wants... and you will be surprised.
Here, if he solves the problem with the loss because of sorting time, he cuts easily the BF time down by half ... or more.
But he will be very lonely in this area ... most of programmers black/white/yellow/blue/red/even zebra hate or despite these filter expressions, like you say you like Latin speaking in our world of living languages
"unless You got 100% sure for password complex policy"
True, but not that difficult. Social Engineering.
No one like risking to be sacked by releasing company secrets, but study their moans/complaint about hated/repeated unwanted monthly job and you see they secretly paint on the wall the company PW policy... what you last need to adore is "Ahummmn you mind tell me you travel far to work"
But you want to apply q, r rule on the Upper case and Special sign only, not all parts of the PW... Very nice trick.
I would put in that what you point here is result of a RegEx filter where your upper case letters [A-z], and special signs !"£$%^&*()@~:;{}[]+-_ <>,.?/|\ should float around the length of your password combis, BUT they can only appears exactly ONCE. The rest of the combi you want to have digits or lower case characters and you also want
1/ it does not matter how many time they occur or
2/ they can sequentially repeat as the rest length allowed
So you look out for something like this filter
[A-Z\!\"\£\$\%\^\&\*\(\)\@\~\:\;\{\}\[\]\+\-\_\ \<\>\,\.\?\/\|\\]\x{x,y}
or something of similar syntax( [...]\x{..})
In words: "matched" if anything matched A-Z or these special sign they can appear only once (But your PW combis consist of ?as so that u and ial sign appear exact once, while the digit or lower appear as they will be pleased
good matchhed
@aabcAa1; @atomAa1 is good
@aa@cAa1 is bad
@aabcAA1 is bad
@!"£$%^Y no one wants
You thought about extensions like
"must have also lower
must use at least (or exact!) one digit ...."
Google Key word is PW policy
RegEx (regular expression) is your key.
Few years ago somewhere I already came across more than 90 pre-formulated filters what you like could already be there.
@Szulik
"BF 12 chars pasword with ?a is almost all time "unpractical" unless You got 100% sure for password complex policy"
No. Because you don't want to see the way he see it, you think about time and use power force to BF.
Try it with 4 or 5 or 6 character/digit/signs PW combis only you will see what he wants... and you will be surprised.
Here, if he solves the problem with the loss because of sorting time, he cuts easily the BF time down by half ... or more.
But he will be very lonely in this area ... most of programmers black/white/yellow/blue/red/even zebra hate or despite these filter expressions, like you say you like Latin speaking in our world of living languages
"unless You got 100% sure for password complex policy"
True, but not that difficult. Social Engineering.
No one like risking to be sacked by releasing company secrets, but study their moans/complaint about hated/repeated unwanted monthly job and you see they secretly paint on the wall the company PW policy... what you last need to adore is "Ahummmn you mind tell me you travel far to work"