New hccapx format explained
#3
Great stuff, handshake capturing always a tricky business. I just gave cap2hccapx a quick spin but didn't have much luck either I'm afraid. cap2hccapx seems to identify incomplete handshakes as good?

Example from a .cap file I found, filtering on EAPOL:
t1. Wireshark reports Message 2 of 4 (airodump-ng picks up no handshake)
t2. Wireshark reports Message 4 of 4 (airodump-ng picks up no handshake)
t3. Wireshark reports Message 3&4 of 4 (airodump-ng pick up no handshake)
t4. Wireshark reports Message 1,2,3&4 of 4 (airodump-ng reports WPA handshake found)

So three failures and one success. Then "aircrack-ng -J" picks up the singular complete handshake "WPA (1 handshake)" as expected.

However, cap2hccapx reports 4 handshakes found:

Networks detected: 1

[*]BSSID=d0:3f:0f:d5:03:25 ESSID=TST260FF (Length: 8)
 --> STA=60:02:b4:e2:5c:a6, Authenticated=1, Replay Counter=0
 --> STA=60:02:b4:e2:5c:a6, Authenticated=0, Replay Counter=0
 --> STA=60:02:b4:e2:5c:a6, Authenticated=0, Replay Counter=0
 --> STA=60:02:b4:e2:5c:a6, Authenticated=1, Replay Counter=0

Written 4 WPA Handshakes to: tst260ff


Latest beta fails to read hccapx file:
Code:
hashcat-3.30+103>hashcat64.exe -a 3 -m 2500 --session=tst260ff -o tst260ff_found.txt --outfile-format=3 tst260ff.hccapx --custom-charset1=35679 08?1?d?d?d?d?d?d?d
hashcat (v3.30-103-g65d5921) starting...

<SNIP old CUDA version warnings>
OpenCL Platform #1: NVIDIA Corporation
======================================
* Device #1: GeForce GTX 760, 512/2048 MB allocatable, 6MCU

OpenCL Platform #2: Intel(R) Corporation
========================================
* Device #2: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-6700K CPU @ 4.00GHz, skipped

Hashfile 'tst260ff.hccapx': Invalid hccapx eapol size
Hashfile 'tst260ff.hccapx': Invalid hccapx signature
Hashfile 'tst260ff.hccapx': Invalid hccapx signature
No hashes loaded

Started: Mon Feb 06 21:54:32 2017
Stopped: Mon Feb 06 21:54:33 2017


Messages In This Thread
New hccapx format explained - by atom - 02-06-2017, 10:29 PM
RE: New hccapx format explained - by martin.po21 - 02-06-2017, 11:39 PM
RE: New hccapx format explained - by atom - 02-07-2017, 11:28 AM
RE: New hccapx format explained - by rico - 02-07-2017, 01:01 AM
RE: New hccapx format explained - by atom - 02-07-2017, 11:49 AM
RE: New hccapx format explained - by atom - 02-07-2017, 12:09 PM
RE: New hccapx format explained - by rico - 02-07-2017, 12:25 PM
RE: New hccapx format explained - by atom - 02-07-2017, 12:29 PM
RE: New hccapx format explained - by rico - 02-07-2017, 10:20 PM
RE: New hccapx format explained - by c4p0ne - 02-08-2017, 02:57 PM
RE: New hccapx format explained - by c4p0ne - 02-08-2017, 06:39 PM
RE: New hccapx format explained - by rico - 02-08-2017, 06:45 PM
RE: New hccapx format explained - by c4p0ne - 02-08-2017, 07:13 PM
RE: New hccapx format explained - by rico - 02-08-2017, 07:17 PM
RE: New hccapx format explained - by atom - 02-08-2017, 09:45 PM
RE: New hccapx format explained - by c4p0ne - 02-08-2017, 11:37 PM
RE: New hccapx format explained - by atom - 02-09-2017, 10:51 AM
RE: New hccapx format explained - by c4p0ne - 02-09-2017, 01:48 PM
RE: New hccapx format explained - by philsmd - 02-09-2017, 02:15 PM
RE: New hccapx format explained - by c4p0ne - 02-09-2017, 10:35 PM
RE: New hccapx format explained - by philsmd - 02-10-2017, 10:51 AM
RE: New hccapx format explained - by c4p0ne - 02-10-2017, 06:42 PM
RE: New hccapx format explained - by abdou99 - 02-10-2017, 12:03 PM
RE: New hccapx format explained - by philsmd - 02-10-2017, 02:20 PM
RE: New hccapx format explained - by abdou99 - 02-10-2017, 02:29 PM
RE: New hccapx format explained - by atom - 02-10-2017, 03:09 PM
RE: New hccapx format explained - by c4p0ne - 02-11-2017, 10:24 PM
RE: New hccapx format explained - by hawaii - 02-15-2017, 06:05 AM
RE: New hccapx format explained - by atom - 02-15-2017, 09:01 PM
RE: New hccapx format explained - by hawaii - 02-15-2017, 09:08 PM
RE: New hccapx format explained - by atom - 02-15-2017, 09:25 PM
RE: New hccapx format explained - by c4p0ne - 02-16-2017, 08:28 PM
RE: New hccapx format explained - by TheFool - 03-09-2017, 06:50 PM
RE: New hccapx format explained - by atom - 02-16-2017, 09:29 PM
RE: New hccapx format explained - by c4p0ne - 02-16-2017, 10:06 PM
RE: New hccapx format explained - by rico - 02-16-2017, 11:25 PM
RE: New hccapx format explained - by abdou99 - 02-26-2017, 01:52 PM
RE: New hccapx format explained - by TNO - 02-26-2017, 07:21 PM
RE: New hccapx format explained - by rico - 02-26-2017, 10:56 PM
RE: New hccapx format explained - by abdou99 - 03-09-2017, 07:10 PM
RE: New hccapx format explained - by TheFool - 03-09-2017, 07:17 PM
RE: New hccapx format explained - by c4p0ne - 03-09-2017, 09:48 PM
RE: New hccapx format explained - by TheFool - 03-10-2017, 01:40 AM
RE: New hccapx format explained - by c4p0ne - 03-10-2017, 02:24 AM
RE: New hccapx format explained - by atom - 03-10-2017, 11:58 AM
RE: New hccapx format explained - by TheFool - 03-11-2017, 07:06 AM
RE: New hccapx format explained - by atom - 03-11-2017, 09:50 PM
RE: New hccapx format explained - by oayz - 09-05-2017, 11:50 PM
RE: New hccapx format explained - by undeath - 12-24-2017, 03:41 PM