12-09-2017, 02:56 AM
(12-08-2017, 04:21 AM)Flomac Wrote: I did indeed. Does not change the fact. You seems to be on a very tight budget, otherwise my recommendation would be a GTX1060. The 2GB GTX 1050 is available for ~100€ in Germany, for that price the pp-ratio is ok. At 165€ for a GTX1050 Ti it isn't.
1050 ti already go over budget but if it is better than 1050 and it is I can borrow some money from friend to buy it since no one buy graphic cards often. This buy will stay couple of years with me for sure, but 1050 ti is limit as my money go for graphic card.
(12-09-2017, 01:31 AM)tacohashcat Wrote: Using Hashcat 4.0.1 (no beta, whatever is on the main page is what I used) on Windows 10, workload 3, GeForce drivers 388.59, and MSI afterburner push the GPU fan up to 100% and running against the sample hashcat WPA/WPA2 hccapx:
Session..........: hashcat
Status...........: Running
Hash.Type........: WPA/WPA2
Hash.Target......: 8381533406003807685881523 (AP:ae:f5:0f:22:80:1c STA:98:7b:dc:f9:f9:50)
Time.Started.....: Fri Dec 08 17:32:04 2017 (9 mins, 46 secs)
Time.Estimated...: Thu Jan 09 02:15:28 2020 (2 years, 31 days)
Guess.Mask.......: ?1?2?2?2?2?2?2?3 [8]
Guess.Charset....: -1 ?l?d?u, -2 ?l?d, -3 ?l?d*!$@_, -4 Undefined
Guess.Queue......: 1/8 (12.50%)
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 84117 H/s (56.45ms)
Recovered........: 0/1 (0.00%) Digests, 0/1 (0.00%) Salts
Progress.........: 45342720/5533380698112 (0.00%)
Rejected.........: 0/45342720 (0.00%)
Restore.Point....: 696320/89248075776 (0.00%)
Candidates.#1....: E2s8cerd -> Eq6wfane
HWMon.Dev.#1.....: Temp: 54c Fan:100% Util: 99% Core:1695MHz Mem:3504MHz Bus:16
[s]tatus [p]ause [r]esume [b]ypass [c]heckpoint [q]uit =>
I never saw it go above 84kH/s, but I didn't update the status too often. The card reached 99% at that capture, so I wouldn't expect it to top 85kH/s in real world applications. As you can see this was after almost 10 mins running, so it had plenty of time to get going. You could try workload w4, but I didn't want to do this since the card I am using pushes display to my monitor and it may become unresponsive.
I never saw temps go above 55C on the card. This is a small GPU with one fan and an OEM cooler, not FE. Power comes from the motherboard, no PCI-E power connectors needed. No other cards are around to block air to the GPU, and my case has good airflow.
Edit: This is also running whatever the stock clocks are. Afterburner would allow tweaking the overclocking, so you might be able to push a bit extra out of the card.
Edit2: and of course, this is on my GTX 1050.
Hmm does not fit !
Your benchmarks shows 94 kH/s and real is 84 kH/s.
Mine sold r9 270x benchmarks shows 96 kH/s and in real it do 93 kH/s, using -w 3 and windows 7 Hashcat 3.5.0.
1050 is more efficient since it consume 75w relative to r9 270x 180w but I was hoping your benchmarks will be close to real time cracking. I found https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-6423.html this is 115 kH/s and this one https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-6167.html 120 kH/s.
So I can expect from your experience 10 kH/s lower which means it is about 105 kH/s 1050 ti.
Don't know but as far as I see it is only choice for me since no benchmarks for rx560 and I wont to take a risk.