01-19-2020, 10:19 AM
Hi Phil,
Thanks for the explanation it's starting to make some sense now
Making those changes has improved the speed. Now performing at 1H/s (1.68ms). I presume that if we want to guard against a power outage we could add the --session to the first hashcat statement? I also notice their is no progress % indicator so no way to really estimate how much faster it is and if it's worth investing in some better hardware?
I understand brute force is inefficient and that's why we have built the wordlist. I have already exhausted the wordlist with a custom character set and the only thing we can think of now is either the word list plus a pin no or possibly just the pin number which I guess is basically brute force but not sure their is any more efficient way to solve than what we are doing?
Thanks for the explanation it's starting to make some sense now
Making those changes has improved the speed. Now performing at 1H/s (1.68ms). I presume that if we want to guard against a power outage we could add the --session to the first hashcat statement? I also notice their is no progress % indicator so no way to really estimate how much faster it is and if it's worth investing in some better hardware? I understand brute force is inefficient and that's why we have built the wordlist. I have already exhausted the wordlist with a custom character set and the only thing we can think of now is either the word list plus a pin no or possibly just the pin number which I guess is basically brute force but not sure their is any more efficient way to solve than what we are doing?