03-30-2012, 09:50 PM
Finally, i've got access to a gtx680 system.
Big thanks to MrUltimate!!
In other words, performance is somewhere in between the gtx560Ti (+5.5%) and the gtx570 (-21.0%).
I am not sure if the gtx680 need special kernel coding to reach full potential, however nothing about this is mentioned in the developer documentation.
It looks like its just that slow...
--
atom
Big thanks to MrUltimate!!
- Windows 7, 64 bit
- ForceWare 301.10
- CUDA 4.2
- GTX680, stock clocks
- oclHashcat-lite 0.10b26
Code:
0 MD5 1752.1M/s
10 md5($pass.$salt) 1752.1M/s
11 Joomla 1694.0M/s
100 SHA1 526.8M/s
101 nsldap, SHA-1(Base64), Netscape LDAP SHA 528.3M/s
110 sha1($pass.$salt) 525.1M/s
111 nsldaps, SSHA-1(Base64), Netscape LDAP SSHA 519.1M/s
112 Oracle 11g 526.3M/s
131 MSSQL(2000) 516.8M/s
132 MSSQL(2005) 519.2M/s
300 MySQL > v4.1 256.5M/s
900 MD4 2668.4M/s
1000 NTLM 2407.4M/s
1100 Domain Cached Credentials, mscash 836.8M/s
1400 SHA256 185.0M/s
1500 descrypt, DES(Unix), Traditional DES 29822.0k/s
1700 SHA512 65829.7k/s
1900 SL3 520.6M/s
2400 Cisco-PIX MD5 1252.7M/s
2600 md5(md5($pass)) 590.1M/s
2611 vBulletin < v3.8.5 590.0M/s
2711 vBulletin > v3.8.5 407.1M/s
2811 IPB 2.0, MyBB1.2 419.5M/s
3000 LM 311.9M/sIn other words, performance is somewhere in between the gtx560Ti (+5.5%) and the gtx570 (-21.0%).
I am not sure if the gtx680 need special kernel coding to reach full potential, however nothing about this is mentioned in the developer documentation.
It looks like its just that slow...
--
atom