why Hashcat v6.2.6 is slower than v4.1.0 (or 5.1.0)
#5
(09-14-2022, 07:55 PM)NoReply Wrote: Just a hunch, but maybe there is a bug such that it uses the optimized kernel in Versions 4.1.0 and 5.1.0 although it says pure kernel is selected.

You could figure out by feeding it long candidates and check whether you get any rejected candidates.

I have tried with your hunch, i created a file with some keywords, some length of keywords greater than 15 (because optimized kernal support maximum password length is 15)
Code:
ksdfsdf asfa 1111111111223456 111111111223456 1111111111223456sdffwefo sdkfsdf

Launch hashcat v4.1.0 without -O param, no rejected, here is the result
Code:
Recovered........: 0/1 (0.00%) Digests, 0/1 (0.00%) Salts Progress.........: 6/6 (100.00%) Rejected.........: 0/6 (0.00%) Restore.Point....: 0/6 (0.00%)

Launch hashcat v4.1.0 with -O param, rejected 2 keywords
Code:
Recovered........: 0/1 (0.00%) Digests, 0/1 (0.00%) Salts Progress.........: 6/6 (100.00%) Rejected.........: 2/6 (33.33%) Restore.Point....: 0/6 (0.00%)

So, it's other bug.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: why Hashcat v6.2.6 is slower than v4.1.0 (or 5.1.0) - by Noema - 09-15-2022, 03:51 AM