My bugs for v0.09b41
#18
For -m 131, I confirm that hash generation was the main source of the problem. There are still bugs however that I will report on the thread of v44.

For -m 2100, I figured out the bug for the length 2 dictionary not being cracked. The hash generated by Atom's perl script was with a username of length 14. Without giving any error message, this hash that was part of a group of 25 hashes total was skipped and not included in the cracking. Generating another hash for the same password with a different user name worked properly.


Messages In This Thread
My bugs for v0.09b41 - by mastercracker - 08-04-2012, 06:39 AM
RE: My bugs for v0.09b41 - by mastercracker - 08-04-2012, 02:12 PM
RE: My bugs for v0.09b41 - by mastercracker - 08-04-2012, 11:53 PM
RE: My bugs for v0.09b41 - by atom - 08-05-2012, 08:41 AM
RE: My bugs for v0.09b41 - by mastercracker - 08-05-2012, 08:01 PM
RE: My bugs for v0.09b41 - by mastercracker - 08-07-2012, 04:48 AM
RE: My bugs for v0.09b41 - by atom - 08-09-2012, 11:09 AM
RE: My bugs for v0.09b41 - by mastercracker - 08-10-2012, 04:28 AM
RE: My bugs for v0.09b41 - by atom - 08-10-2012, 11:15 AM
RE: My bugs for v0.09b41 - by atom - 08-10-2012, 11:37 AM
RE: My bugs for v0.09b41 - by mastercracker - 08-11-2012, 03:54 AM
RE: My bugs for v0.09b41 - by atom - 08-10-2012, 12:24 PM
RE: My bugs for v0.09b41 - by atom - 08-10-2012, 12:24 PM
RE: My bugs for v0.09b41 - by atom - 08-10-2012, 12:25 PM
RE: My bugs for v0.09b41 - by atom - 08-10-2012, 12:42 PM
RE: My bugs for v0.09b41 - by atom - 08-10-2012, 01:50 PM
RE: My bugs for v0.09b41 - by atom - 08-10-2012, 01:51 PM
RE: My bugs for v0.09b41 - by mastercracker - 08-12-2012, 03:22 AM
RE: My bugs for v0.09b41 - by atom - 08-12-2012, 06:29 PM