cudaHashCat64 on AWS EC2
#3
(03-03-2015, 12:13 AM)epixoip Wrote: K520 is 5.3x slower than a GTX 970 and 6x slower than a GTX 980, so probably not worth the cost.

For sure, just a small project I was working on. It's hard to beat the almost $0 startup cost. I can pay for several hundred hours for the same costs that it would take to start up something on my own (in a fraction of the time).

But agreed, in the long run, may not be worth it especially if the AWS cloud can not keep up with top end equipment.


Messages In This Thread
cudaHashCat64 on AWS EC2 - by Radical_Ronin - 03-02-2015, 06:35 PM
RE: cudaHashCat64 on AWS EC2 - by epixoip - 03-03-2015, 12:13 AM
RE: cudaHashCat64 on AWS EC2 - by Radical_Ronin - 03-03-2015, 01:14 AM
RE: cudaHashCat64 on AWS EC2 - by shodan - 03-05-2015, 01:18 PM
RE: cudaHashCat64 on AWS EC2 - by vladimir125 - 03-09-2015, 04:52 PM
RE: cudaHashCat64 on AWS EC2 - by cremefraiche - 05-12-2015, 11:02 AM
RE: cudaHashCat64 on AWS EC2 - by epixoip - 05-12-2015, 04:49 PM
RE: cudaHashCat64 on AWS EC2 - by cremefraiche - 05-12-2015, 05:39 PM
RE: cudaHashCat64 on AWS EC2 - by KT819GM - 05-12-2015, 09:18 PM
RE: cudaHashCat64 on AWS EC2 - by cremefraiche - 05-13-2015, 03:57 AM
RE: cudaHashCat64 on AWS EC2 - by heydonms - 05-19-2015, 07:11 AM
RE: cudaHashCat64 on AWS EC2 - by szhairui - 04-01-2018, 04:27 PM
RE: cudaHashCat64 on AWS EC2 - by MrMeeseeks - 04-02-2018, 05:35 PM