Limiting the consecutive occurrence

[Hash-IT]

would expected more. Is that only allowing no more than 2 chars at a time eg
AABAABAA

Hi Pixel

Unfortunately not, it was based on the fact that there would only be a single instance consecutively. Also I haven’t worked out yet how to check for multiple entries in a line if they are not consecutive. I have asked someone about this and I will get back asap. I was hoping M@lik might have a couple of tips for us but he is revising for exams now I think.

Saying that, an 18% reduction in keyspace is pretty significant to me !

EDIT: Heres the full A-Z_UPPER_LEN_8 lists I generated some time ago. Bet Atom is shaking his head at this Oh well hehe.

Thanks again for the links and effort you have put into this request, don’t worry about putting those sorts of links up, atom just doesn’t want warez, hacking, or hash requests etc.

ULM is an old favourite of mine, I beta tested that so hard for Blazer when he was writing it I think I made him regret starting it. I made requests on an almost daily basis and I must have drove him nuts !! I really liked Blazer, he was very helpful and tried his best to make things work as users requested. I wish he hadn’t moved on to other things as ULM was really coming on. It has a few bugs still but it is by far the best password list manager there has ever been. He wouldn’t accept help and did everything on his own which may have made things more difficult but that was his hobby so that’s how he did it. I wish he would come back to it one day and if he does I am ready and waiting with requests and bug testing !!! If you ever get to talk with him he is a nice chap and very helpful.

The lack of progress we have made on this, as humble forum members, just goes to show that without atom things just wouldn’t get done. I am sure he is already aware of this fact but it makes me appreciate his work here more than ever. To quote Waynes World, “We are not worthy” !!!

Thanks for sticking with this Pixel, I am working on it !