oclHashCat vs WPA @ 9700 H/s
#3
(05-14-2014, 07:56 AM)epixoip Wrote: the GTX 650 should be only slightly faster than the 250 GTS. it certainly wouldn't smoke it, they're both low-mid range cards with very similar processing power. it also doesn't help that they're both nvidia.

9-10 KH/s is right about what you should be getting with those cards. you might be able to get a little bit more performance out of them by using the appropriate -n and -u values, and sorting your wordlists by length.

Good info, thanks for the reply.

Two Questions: (1) when you said "it doesn't help that their both nvidia", are you saying that AMD is better (more bang for the buck) at this kind of work? (2) If I were to go out and spend $150-$200 on a card today approx what kind of scores could I expect? 12KH/s? 15? 20? etc


Messages In This Thread
oclHashCat vs WPA @ 9700 H/s - by xenon - 05-14-2014, 06:47 AM
RE: oclHashCat vs WPA @ 9700 H/s - by epixoip - 05-14-2014, 07:56 AM
RE: oclHashCat vs WPA @ 9700 H/s - by xenon - 05-15-2014, 01:52 AM
RE: oclHashCat vs WPA @ 9700 H/s - by epixoip - 05-15-2014, 07:47 AM
RE: oclHashCat vs WPA @ 9700 H/s - by xenon - 05-17-2014, 09:48 AM
RE: oclHashCat vs WPA @ 9700 H/s - by tkalfaoglu - 05-15-2014, 09:41 AM