04-01-2018, 04:27 PM
(03-02-2015, 06:35 PM)Radical_Ronin Wrote: Hey All,
Worked on a fun project and thought this may help someone else out who's looking for some serious hardware to crack on. Theres a couple of other guides out there but they are pretty out dated and some of the AMIs dont even work any more.
......
lspci
00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation 440FX - 82441FX PMC [Natoma] (rev 02)
00:01.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corporation 82371SB PIIX3 ISA [Natoma/Triton II]
00:01.1 IDE interface: Intel Corporation 82371SB PIIX3 IDE [Natoma/Triton II]
00:01.3 Bridge: Intel Corporation 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 ACPI (rev 01)
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Cirrus Logic GD 5446
00:03.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation GK104GL [GRID K520] (rev a1)
00:1f.0 Unassigned class [ff80]: XenSource, Inc. Xen Platform Device (rev 01)
......
Hashtype: SHA512
Workload: 256 loops, 256 accel
Speed.GPU.#1.: 71354.4 kH/s
......
Thanks for your post.
But my problem is that my hacking speed is too slow.
Quote:PS E:\Dev\ .\hc.exe -m 1800 -b --optimized-kernel-enable
hashcat (v4.1.0) starting in benchmark mode...
Benchmarking uses hand-optimized kernel code by default.
You can use it in your cracking session by setting the -O option.
Note: Using optimized kernel code limits the maximum supported password length.
To disable the optimized kernel code in benchmark mode, use the -w option.
OpenCL Platform #1: NVIDIA Corporation
======================================
* Device #1: GeForce GTX 970, 1024/4096 MB allocatable, 13MCU
Benchmark relevant options:
===========================
* --optimized-kernel-enable
Hashmode: 1800 - sha512crypt $6$, SHA512 (Unix) (Iterations: 5000)
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 75255 H/s (69.85ms) @ Accel:512 Loops:128 Thr:32 Vec:1
Started: Sun Apr 01 22:23:39 2018
Stopped: Sun Apr 01 22:23:48 2018
Is there any difference between cudaHashcat and Hashcat (v4,.1.0)?