03-06-2015, 05:25 PM
I've reproduced the case, it's actually slower. Thanks for reporting!
But no worries, I already found the reason and fixed it. The bitmaps were optimized to run faster on a different hashlist size (much smaller one), but I an see that hashlist size around 500k is what we deal most of the time.
Old 1.33:
New 1.34:
But no worries, I already found the reason and fixed it. The bitmaps were optimized to run faster on a different hashlist size (much smaller one), but I an see that hashlist size around 500k is what we deal most of the time.
Old 1.33:
Quote:root@et:~/oclHashcat-1.34# ./oclHashcat64.bin 1015.notfound ?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1 -a 3 -1 ?l?d -w 3 -o x
oclHashcat v1.33 starting...
...
Speed.GPU.#1...: 2184.6 MH/s
Speed.GPU.#2...: 2184.3 MH/s
Speed.GPU.#3...: 2184.0 MH/s
Speed.GPU.#*...: 6552.9 MH/s
...
New 1.34:
Quote:root@et:~/oclHashcat-1.34# ./oclHashcat64.bin 1015.notfound ?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1 -a 3 -1 ?l?d -w 3 -o x
oclHashcat v1.34 starting...
...
Speed.GPU.#1...: 5119.4 MH/s
Speed.GPU.#2...: 5118.4 MH/s
Speed.GPU.#3...: 5118.2 MH/s
Speed.GPU.#*...: 15355.9 MH/s
...