Build with two Nvidia RTX 3090
#11
Session..........: hashcat
Status...........: Running
Hash.Mode........: 1000 (NTLM)
Hash.Target......: Example Hash
Time.Started.....: Tue Jan 04 20:01:42 2022 (3 mins, 15 secs)
Time.Estimated...: Wed Jan 05 21:59:17 2022 (1 day, 1 hour)
Kernel.Feature...: Pure Kernel
Guess.Mask.......: ?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a [8]
Guess.Queue......: 1/1 (100.00%)
Speed.#1.........: 33000.3 MH/s (82.65ms) @ Accel:128 Loops:512 Thr:512 Vec:1
Speed.#2.........: 37987.9 MH/s (72.01ms) @ Accel:128 Loops:512 Thr:512 Vec:1
Speed.#*.........: 70988.2 MH/s
Recovered........: 0/1 (0.00%) Digests
Progress.........: 13834691280896/6634204312890625 (0.21%)
Rejected.........: 0/13834691280896 (0.00%)
Restore.Point....: 5373952/7737809375 (0.07%)
Restore.Sub.#1...: Salt:0 Amplifier:338944-339456 Iteration:0-512
Restore.Sub.#2...: Salt:0 Amplifier:520192-520704 Iteration:0-1024
Candidate.Engine.: Device Generator
Candidates.#1....: "z_QX$** -> eEdW>2pa
Candidates.#2....: UXy] RRL -> lTd!7#on
Hardware.Mon.#1..: Temp: 62c Fan: 85% Util: 99% Core:1838MHz Mem:9492MHz Bus:16
Hardware.Mon.#2..: Temp: 57c Fan: 85% Util: 99% Core:1849MHz Mem:9492MHz Bus:16


Heres what my temps look like with NTLM with fans @ 85% 
Reply
#12
Why does your speed seem very slow for NTLM, the 3090 benchmarks at 121GH .. your only getting 33-38Gh ...
Reply
#13
(01-05-2022, 04:08 AM)slyexe Wrote: Session..........: hashcat
Status...........: Running
Hash.Mode........: 1000 (NTLM)
Hash.Target......: Example Hash
Time.Started.....: Tue Jan 04 20:01:42 2022 (3 mins, 15 secs)
Time.Estimated...: Wed Jan 05 21:59:17 2022 (1 day, 1 hour)
Kernel.Feature...: Pure Kernel
Guess.Mask.......: ?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a [8]
Guess.Queue......: 1/1 (100.00%)
Speed.#1.........: 33000.3 MH/s (82.65ms) @ Accel:128 Loops:512 Thr:512 Vec:1
Speed.#2.........: 37987.9 MH/s (72.01ms) @ Accel:128 Loops:512 Thr:512 Vec:1
Speed.#*.........: 70988.2 MH/s
Recovered........: 0/1 (0.00%) Digests
Progress.........: 13834691280896/6634204312890625 (0.21%)
Rejected.........: 0/13834691280896 (0.00%)
Restore.Point....: 5373952/7737809375 (0.07%)
Restore.Sub.#1...: Salt:0 Amplifier:338944-339456 Iteration:0-512
Restore.Sub.#2...: Salt:0 Amplifier:520192-520704 Iteration:0-1024
Candidate.Engine.: Device Generator
Candidates.#1....: "z_QX$** -> eEdW>2pa
Candidates.#2....: UXy] RRL -> lTd!7#on
Hardware.Mon.#1..: Temp: 62c Fan: 85% Util: 99% Core:1838MHz Mem:9492MHz Bus:16
Hardware.Mon.#2..: Temp: 57c Fan: 85% Util: 99% Core:1849MHz Mem:9492MHz Bus:16


Heres what my temps look like with NTLM with fans @ 85% 

I got my duo 3090 benchmark with default workload,don't use the -w 3, it will reduce the performance:
CUDA API (CUDA 11.5)
====================
* Device #1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, 23336/24575 MB, 82MCU
* Device #2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, 23336/24575 MB, 82MCU

OpenCL API (OpenCL 3.0 CUDA 11.5.125) - Platform #1 [NVIDIA Corporation]
========================================================================
* Device #3: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, skipped
* Device #4: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, skipped

Benchmark relevant options:
===========================
* --optimized-kernel-enable

-----------------------
* Hash-Mode 1000 (NTLM)
-----------------------

Speed.#1.........:  117.3 GH/s (23.17ms) @ Accel:128 Loops:1024 Thr:256 Vec:8
Speed.#2.........:  123.0 GH/s (22.09ms) @ Accel:128 Loops:1024 Thr:256 Vec:8
Speed.#*.........:  240.4 GH/s

Started: Thu Jan 06 23:14:33 2022
Stopped: Thu Jan 06 23:14:38 2022

CUDA API (CUDA 11.5)
====================
* Device #1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, 23336/24575 MB, 82MCU
* Device #2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, 23336/24575 MB, 82MCU

OpenCL API (OpenCL 3.0 CUDA 11.5.125) - Platform #1 [NVIDIA Corporation]
========================================================================
* Device #3: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, skipped
* Device #4: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, skipped

Benchmark relevant options:
===========================
* --workload-profile=3

-----------------------
* Hash-Mode 1000 (NTLM)
-----------------------

Speed.#1.........: 35589.6 MH/s (76.76ms) @ Accel:128 Loops:512 Thr:512 Vec:1
Speed.#2.........: 37491.8 MH/s (72.89ms) @ Accel:128 Loops:512 Thr:512 Vec:1
Speed.#*.........: 73081.4 MH/s

Started: Thu Jan 06 23:15:06 2022
Reply
#14
(01-04-2022, 08:44 PM)drsnooker Wrote: 1800 passwords every 3 months? Sounds like someone isn't following Microsofts policy and turning off mandatory password changes as they aren't more secure, than picking one and staying with it!

https://arstechnica.com/information-tech...-obsolete/

This was just a rough estimate as to how many times a year we might run hashcat against our hashes. More or less a catchall for users that might have had password changes if they forgot their pw and new users etc.
Reply