Posts: 7
Threads: 3
Joined: Aug 2012
Hey, My current computer has bad specs so I'm about to run an attack over night on some vbulletin hashes that are in the following format:
Code:
fcxxabxx7fxx43xx77xxbfxx2axx8exx:yD#>xx=H)y!xxJmRxx!>yB$-]:eC4U
As you can see in this particular hash, hashcat will return with "Seperator unmatched" and carry on.
Due to the second ":" in the salt.
So my question is, Will it keep on running the hash assuming that the first ":" is the actual seperator?
Posts: 414
Threads: 14
Joined: Mar 2012
What -m you're using?
Or post your command-line here.
Posts: 7
Threads: 3
Joined: Aug 2012
(08-18-2012, 03:47 AM)M@LIK Wrote: What -m you're using?
Or post your command-line here.
thanks:
Code:
./hashcat-cli32.bin -m 2711 -a 0 --rules=rules/best64.rule hash.txt ../wordlists/
Posts: 5,232
Threads: 233
Joined: Apr 2010
This is not about the 2nd : it can handle it pretty good. You get "Seperator unmatched" if the : is not at possition 33 of the line. In your example it is, so thats a bit strange, you sure its this hash?
Posts: 7
Threads: 3
Joined: Aug 2012
(08-19-2012, 10:24 AM)atom Wrote: This is not about the 2nd : it can handle it pretty good. You get "Seperator unmatched" if the : is not at possition 33 of the line. In your example it is, so thats a bit strange, you sure its this hash?
Yes im sure, hmm Ive always got it on salts with two colons, but it has still cracked the forementioned hash
alts's.
