hashcat Forum › Developer › Beta Tester v
Performace Loss Numbers

Thread Closed 
Threaded Mode
Performace Loss Numbers
mastercracker Offline
Senior Member
****
Posts: 621
Threads: 57
Joined: May 2010
#11
06-21-2013, 03:04 AM (This post was last modified: 06-21-2013, 03:07 AM by mastercracker.)
Great job. I am cracking lots of very tough/long passwords now. Is there a minimum driver version that should be used for Nvidia? OclHashcat-plus keeps crashing the driver and I don't know if it is a bug or just the wrong driver (too old). I am using 310.90
Find
atom Offline
Administrator
*******
Posts: 5,185
Threads: 230
Joined: Apr 2010
#12
06-21-2013, 06:26 AM
Also with b33? Im using 319.x + driver
Website Find
mastercracker Offline
Senior Member
****
Posts: 621
Threads: 57
Joined: May 2010
#13
06-21-2013, 02:38 PM
(06-21-2013, 06:26 AM)atom Wrote: Also with b33? Im using 319.x + driver
It was with b32 and with multi-gpu. Still not sure in which circumstance the crash occurs (attack type, load, etc.).
Find
Hash-IT Offline
Moderator
*****
Posts: 723
Threads: 85
Joined: Apr 2011
#14
06-27-2013, 09:25 PM
I am sooooo happy, thank you very much atom >16 support has been on my wish list for a very long time. You have done an amazing job to retain functionality and speed.

Thank you.
Find
blazer Offline
Member
***
Posts: 85
Threads: 15
Joined: Jun 2010
#15
08-18-2013, 07:17 AM (This post was last modified: 08-18-2013, 07:22 AM by blazer.)
i know i'm a bit late to the thread just doing some catchup reading. Not sure if the discussion is still relevant.

Is it possible to scan the rule file first and only tell the rule processor to process those rules and not the unnecessary ones, so you won't lose performance for users who aren't using all the rules.

So I guess either have multiple rule engines and pick the best or have a dynamically initiated rule engine if possible.
Find
Thread Closed