10-09-2013, 09:38 AM
If you think you found a bug, please post it on TRAC including all information how to reproduce.
0.15 and problems
|
10-09-2013, 09:38 AM
If you think you found a bug, please post it on TRAC including all information how to reproduce.
Updated drivers to 13.09
MD5 not working: oclHashcat-plus v0.15 by atom starting... Hashes: 229920 total, 1 unique salts, 229920 unique digests Bitmaps: 21 bits, 1048576 entries, 0x000fffff mask, 4194304 bytes Rules: 465 Workload: 256 loops, 80 accel Watchdog: Temperature abort trigger set to 90c Watchdog: Temperature retain trigger set to 80c Device #1: Turks, 1024MB, 1000Mhz, 6MCU Device #2: Tahiti, 2048MB, 1000Mhz, 32MCU Device #1: Kernel C:\Programs\oclHashCat\oclHashcat-plus/kernels4098/m0000_a0.Turks_1268.1_1268.1 (VM).kernel (920744 bytes) Device #1: Kernel C:\Programs\oclHashCat\oclHashcat-plus/kernels/4098/bzero.Turks_1268.1_1268.1 (VM).kernel (33864 bytes) ERROR: clCreateCommandQueue() -6 PS: WPA cracking works ok
10-22-2013, 07:13 PM
(10-08-2013, 06:51 PM)mastercracker Wrote: Just a tip to improve performance. When you want to do a combination attack that uses a small dictionary as the starting one, convert that dictionary to prepending rules (don't forget to reverse the order) and do a regular dictionary attack with the big dictionary as input and the rules as modifiers. Today i've tried dictionaries, converted to rules. Noting changed, 6670 works for 25% of it's capabilities, 7970 doing nothing: [s]tatus [p]ause [r]esume [b]ypass [q]uit => Session.Name...: eharmony Status.........: Running Rules.Type.....: File (uppercase.rule), File (prepend.rule), File (append.rule) Input.Mode.....: File (J:\WiFi\Dict\English.txt) Hash.Target....: File (T:\wifi\md5\eharmony.txt) Hash.Type......: MD5 Time.Started...: Tue Oct 22 20:00:38 2013 (6 mins, 45 secs) Time.Estimated.: Tue Oct 22 22:15:38 2013 (2 hours, 8 mins) Speed.GPU.#1...: 169.1 MH/s Speed.GPU.#2...: 0 H/s Speed.GPU.#*...: 169.1 MH/s Recovered......: 78/227622 (0.03%) Digests, 0/1 (0.00%) Salts Progress.......: 71168950272/1421437165691 (5.01%) Rejected.......: 0/71168950272 (0.00%) HWMon.GPU.#1...: 99% Util, 45c Temp, 20% Fan HWMon.GPU.#2...: 99% Util, 48c Temp, N/A Fan 99% Util on both GPUs, and idle GPU Temperatures. I don't know guys, maybe i'm doing something wrong, but ohc+ act weird to me.
10-22-2013, 07:48 PM
you're chaining too many rules together.
(10-22-2013, 07:48 PM)epixoip Wrote: you're chaining too many rules together. I've tried to join some dictionaries. It worked slowly, and they told me to use rules. Now i'm using rules, and nothing changed. Any new ideas? Besides, during this run (it still works, yet), ohc+ suddenly jumped to 300mh/s+1400mh/s, processed about 30% of dictionary with that speed, then fell back to 160mh/s+0h/s PS: This run finished, it took 1 hour 17 minutes to complete. Then i've repeated it with the same options, just added --gpu-devices=2 This time ohc+ completed calculations in 19 minutes. So, it takes 77 minutes for 7970+6670 to do the job, and 19 minutes for single 7970. Can somebody explain this? And speed was decreasing during the run: 40% Session.Name...: eharmony Status.........: Running Rules.Type.....: File (uppercase.rule), File (prepend.rule), File (append.rule) Input.Mode.....: File (J:\WiFi\Dict\English.txt) Hash.Target....: File (T:\wifi\md5\eharmony.txt) Hash.Type......: MD5 Time.Started...: Tue Oct 22 21:17:50 2013 (7 mins, 15 secs) Time.Estimated.: Tue Oct 22 21:36:05 2013 (10 mins, 59 secs) Speed.GPU.#1...: 1291.3 MH/s Recovered......: 0/227187 (0.00%) Digests, 0/1 (0.00%) Salts Progress.......: 565325070336/1421437165691 (39.77%) Rejected.......: 0/565325070336 (0.00%) HWMon.GPU.#1...: 0% Util, 36c Temp, N/A Fan 100% Session.Name...: eharmony Status.........: Exhausted Rules.Type.....: File (uppercase.rule), File (prepend.rule), File (append.rule) Input.Mode.....: File (J:\WiFi\Dict\English.txt) Hash.Target....: File (T:\wifi\md5\eharmony.txt) Hash.Type......: MD5 Time.Started...: Tue Oct 22 21:17:50 2013 (19 mins, 9 secs) Time.Estimated.: 0 secs Speed.GPU.#1...: 1031.5 MH/s Recovered......: 0/227187 (0.00%) Digests, 0/1 (0.00%) Salts Progress.......: 1421437165691/1421437165691 (100.00%) Rejected.......: 0/1421437165691 (0.00%) HWMon.GPU.#1...: 0% Util, 37c Temp, N/A Fan
10-23-2013, 04:32 PM
Running dictionary+mask. OHC+ lives with the life of it's own:
In the beginning: Session.Name...: eharmony Status.........: Running Input.Base.....: File (J:\WiFi\Dict\English.txt) Input.Mod......: Mask (?1?1?1?1) [4] Hash.Target....: File (T:\wifi\md5\eharmony.txt) Hash.Type......: MD5 Time.Started...: Wed Oct 23 17:19:11 2013 (1 min, 38 secs) Time.Estimated.: Wed Oct 23 17:26:54 2013 (6 mins, 4 secs) Speed.GPU.#1...: 485.3 MH/s Speed.GPU.#2...: 1874.0 MH/s Speed.GPU.#*...: 2359.2 MH/s Recovered......: 1/226879 (0.00%) Digests, 0/1 (0.00%) Salts Progress.......: 231372624896/1090498373771 (21.22%) Rejected.......: 0/231372624896 (0.00%) HWMon.GPU.#1...: 95% Util, 73c Temp, 55% Fan HWMon.GPU.#2...: 98% Util, 48c Temp, N/A Fan In a couple of minutes: Session.Name...: eharmony Status.........: Running Input.Base.....: File (J:\WiFi\Dict\English.txt) Input.Mod......: Mask (?1?1?1?1) [4] Hash.Target....: File (T:\wifi\md5\eharmony.txt) Hash.Type......: MD5 Time.Started...: Wed Oct 23 17:19:11 2013 (4 mins, 19 secs) Time.Estimated.: Wed Oct 23 17:31:11 2013 (7 mins, 39 secs) Speed.GPU.#1...: 496.9 MH/s Speed.GPU.#2...: 0 H/s Speed.GPU.#*...: 496.9 MH/s Recovered......: 1/226879 (0.00%) Digests, 0/1 (0.00%) Salts Progress.......: 394094651806/1090498373771 (36.14%) Rejected.......: 0/394094651806 (0.00%) HWMon.GPU.#1...: 0% Util, 51c Temp, 20% Fan HWMon.GPU.#2...: 99% Util, 52c Temp, N/A Fan I' tried to interrupt it, and force 7970 usage only, pressed 'q' and... hashcat stopped calculations but did not exited and froze. i had to kill process. So, i'm sure by now - there is a bug somewhere in multi-gpu processing, and odd behavior have nothing to do with small dictionaries, rules etc... I just wonder, if anybody will listen to what i'm saying and will fix it.
10-23-2013, 05:51 PM
Long thread.
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|