Posts: 2,936
Threads: 12
Joined: May 2012
I've not tested attempting to escape commas in the custom charset, but you can try.
So the first two lines of your hcmask file (based on the masks you generated above) would be:
.\,,;.-_):,!Ii!?1HuW18483?2?2?2?2?2123456789+'+uHdbHDhE
.\,,;.-_):,!Ii!?1HuW?218483?2?2?2?2123456789+'+uHdbHDhE
Posts: 10
Threads: 1
Joined: Apr 2015
Would it work if a script would execute command one by one like that:
./oclHashcat-plus64.bin -m 6211 -a 3 -n 32 /root/desktop/countainer.tc -1 '.,' -2 ';,.-_):' '!Ii!?1HuW18483?2?2?2?2?2123456789+'\''+uHdbHDhE' -o /root/desktop/found/found1.txt
./oclHashcat-plus64.bin -m 6211 -a 3 -n 32 /root/desktop/countainer.tc -1 '.,' -2 ';,.-_):' '!Ii!?1HuW?218483?2?2?2?2123456789+'\''+uHdbHDhE' -o /root/desktop/found/found2.txt
...
Could you try the hcmask with the ones you wrote above? I can't test it right now and you would help me a lot and other people who have the same question about hcmask .
And can you answer my other questions?
1.) Which OS would bring best speed with AMD R9 290X?
2.) Is a slash / in the password a problem for hashcat?
3.) Does it any difference for cracking speed if the TC Countainer file is 5mb or 5gb big?
Posts: 2,936
Threads: 12
Joined: May 2012
Yes, that's precisely how you would script it out as I suggested.
OS is irrelevant.
No, a slash is not a problem.
No, the size of the container is irrelevant.
Posts: 10
Threads: 1
Joined: Apr 2015
04-02-2015, 07:46 AM
(This post was last modified: 04-02-2015, 08:27 AM by MultiFilm.)
Thanks for your reply.
I tried this Option yesterday:
.\,,;.-_):,!Ii!?1HuW?218483?2?2?2?2123456789+'+uHdbHDhE
it won't really start if it's like that only that way:
.,;.-_):,!Ii!?1HuW?218483?2?2?2?2123456789+'+uHdbHDhE
but than there is no comma in it. I tried this on windows. Do you think the result would be different on ubuntu?
How would you script it out for an automatic run? I have to many masks to start them one by one.
€dit: Isn't there no option in hashcat when you have a comma in your custom charset?
Posts: 10
Threads: 1
Joined: Apr 2015
Okay it's now running one by one in a batch file.
But I just get a speed of 125 kH/s, do you know why?
Shouldn't it be like 400-500 kH/s with the AMD R9 290X (Katalyst 14.9)
Posts: 68
Threads: 3
Joined: Feb 2011
Post the commands that you ended up putting in that batch
sch0.org
Posts: 10
Threads: 1
Joined: Apr 2015
like that:
-m 6211 -a 3 -n 32 /root/desktop/countainer.tc -1 ';,.-_):' '!Ii!,HuW18483?1?1?1?1?1123456789+'\''+uHdbHDhE' -o /root/desktop/found/found1.txt
Posts: 2,936
Threads: 12
Joined: May 2012
The keyspace is likely too small to achieve full acceleration, thus the low speed.
