5870 vs 6870
#1
Hello !
http://golubev.com/gpuest.htm and http://www.gat3way.eu/est.php are not working so I must to ask here...


I have 5870 and I use it for brute force wpa/wpa2 with oclhashcat in The-Distribution-Which-Does-Not-Handle-OpenCL-Well (Kali), now I can get 6870 NEW, for affordable price, and I wonder whether it is worth to do this replacement ?

Can someone tell me how much 6870 can do kH/s in normal mode, not overclocked ?

Or if someone can share some web site where I can see graphic card comparation for bruteforce WPA/WPA2 ?
Reply
#2
6870 is 30% slower than the 5870.
Reply
#3
I have a local [slightly updated/modified] copy of http://golubev.com/gpuest.htm in a spreadsheet. Can confirm numbers:

5870: 79,036 H/s WPA
6870: 58,579 H/s WPA

5870 is 35% faster than 6870.

I've no idea how to format the entire spreadsheet into a table here though. I can dump what I have if anyone's interested. E.g. here's the "ATI Radeon HD 5XXX/68XX series (VLIW5 + BIT_ALIGN + BFI_INT)" section

ATI Radeon HD 5XXX/68XX series (VLIW5 + BIT_ALIGN + BFI_INT)

GPU Name SP/ALU count Clock rate WPA speed
Radeon HD 6250 80 280 1302
Radeon HD 5450 80 650 3022
Radeon HD 5550 320 550 10228
Radeon HD 5570 400 650 15110
Radeon HD 6570 480 650 18132
Mobility Radeon HD 5650 400 450 10461
Mobility Radeon HD 5730 400 650 15110
Radeon HD 5670 400 775 18016
Radeon HD 5750 720 700 29290
Radeon HD 5770 800 850 39518
Radeon HD 6850 960 775 43237
Radeon HD 5830 1120 800 52071
Radeon HD 6870 1120 900 58579
Radeon HD 5850 1440 725 60672
Radeon HD 5870 1600 850 79036
Radeon HD 5970 3200 725 175000
Reply
#4
Thank you guys for helping !

@Rico, can you post all tables from golubev.com here or on PM, I love to have this informations ?
Reply
#5
There are several screenshots/mirrors of the html pages around, e.g. see:
[Image: CUQtIjh.png]
Reply
#6
Thank you so much for this.
Reply
#7
@philsmd

Thank you I have been searching for this for sometime now - I wish I had done
the same as you and kept an updated jpeg the one I have stops at the 69xx

Rab.
Reply