Posts: 3
	Threads: 1
	Joined: May 2016
	
	
 
	
	
		I try to use a mask over 8, but it always shows this:
Input.Mode .....: Mask (?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1) [8]
I've tried 10, 12, 15.. it always indicates 8 instead, is this the max supported mask when brute forcing?
I'm using cudaHashcat64.exe with a GTX 970.
	
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 2,935
	Threads: 12
	Joined: May 2012
	
	
 
	
	
		You should probably show us your command line
	
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 3
	Threads: 1
	Joined: May 2016
	
	
 
	
	
		e.g.
cudaHashcat64.exe -m 2500 --session=Sess1 -a 3 -i "..\WiFi Handshakes\Wifi-01.hccap" ?l?l?l?l?l?l?l?l?l?l
= 10 mask length, but it produces this:
Input.Mode.....: Mask (?l?l?l?l?l?l?l?l) [8]
	
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 2,935
	Threads: 12
	Joined: May 2012
	
	
 
	
	
		You're using -i, that's why. You should probably know what the switches you're using mean.
	
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 649
	Threads: 18
	Joined: Nov 2010
	
	
 
	
	
		was gonna call it, but meh
	
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 2,935
	Threads: 12
	Joined: May 2012
	
	
 
	
	
		Oh we all knew, just wanted to verify 
 
	 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 3
	Threads: 1
	Joined: May 2016
	
	
 
	
		
		
		05-11-2016, 01:01 AM 
(This post was last modified: 05-11-2016, 01:27 AM by Corvinus.)
		
	 
	
		Please point me to where it says that 8 is the max length of a mask if used together with the "-i" parameter.
EDIT: Okay, since WPA is minimum 8 it starts there, I thought it indicated my defined mask length and shortened it. I suppose it will run the length of the mask defined and increment all the way.
	
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 2,935
	Threads: 12
	Joined: May 2012
	
	
 
	
	
		It's not the max, it will just take a very long time to brute force length 8 before moving to length 9 (if it ever does.) If you actually want to brute force length 10 (impossible) without brute forcing lengths 8 & 9 (also impossible), get rid of the incremental switch.