Nvidia 3090 benchmarks
#1
Code:
Not able to perform the full benchmark due to an error

Hashmode: 0 - MD5

Speed.#1.........: 66690.4 MH/s (41.01ms) @ Accel:32 Loops:1024 Thr:1024 Vec:1

Hashmode: 100 - SHA1

Speed.#1.........: 22630.7 MH/s (60.46ms) @ Accel:32 Loops:512 Thr:1024 Vec:1

Hashmode: 1400 - SHA2-256

Speed.#1.........:  9754.5 MH/s (69.93ms) @ Accel:16 Loops:512 Thr:1024 Vec:1

Hashmode: 1700 - SHA2-512

Speed.#1.........:  2869.7 MH/s (59.28ms) @ Accel:4 Loops:512 Thr:1024 Vec:1

Hashmode: 22000 - WPA-PBKDF2-PMKID+EAPOL (Iterations: 4095)

Speed.#1.........:  1131.5 kH/s (73.61ms) @ Accel:4 Loops:1024 Thr:1024 Vec:1

Hashmode: 1000 - NTLM

Speed.#1.........:  119.9 GH/s (22.53ms) @ Accel:32 Loops:1024 Thr:1024 Vec:1

Hashmode: 3000 - LM

Speed.#1.........: 67979.9 MH/s (39.83ms) @ Accel:512 Loops:1024 Thr:64 Vec:1

Hashmode: 5500 - NetNTLMv1 / NetNTLMv1+ESS

Started: Mon Sep 28 14:47:05 2020


Hashmode: 3200 - bcrypt $2*$, Blowfish (Unix) (Iterations: 32)

Speed.#1.........:    96844 H/s (35.72ms) @ Accel:4 Loops:32 Thr:11 Vec:1

Started: Mon Sep 28 14:51:54 2020

+350Mhz on Memory                                 
Hashmode: 3200 - bcrypt $2*$, Blowfish (Unix) (Iterations: 32)

Speed.#1.........:    97993 H/s (35.82ms) @ Accel:8 Loops:16 Thr:11 Vec:1

Started: Mon Sep 28 14:56:17 2020

Seems to range from 20-30% faster on various algos against 3080. Not worth it for 2x the price really unless you want maximum density per box.
Reply
#2
Is there a full version of the benchmark information, I want to know all the hash benchmark information.
Reply
#3
full benchmark here

https://gist.github.com/Chick3nman/e4fce...2106d73fef
Reply
#4
It looks like the upcoming rtx 3080 turbo blower cards is going to be the best/easiest solution, and also value for money.

I would like to know the actual power draw of the 3080 running hashcat.

Have you godt a good solution to use many cards without putting blower cards in a server?
Reply
#5
Also interested in the consumption of electricity
Reply
#6
power draw would be nice to know
Reply