Yeah, looks good Tuxel (if you are sure about the hard-coded "48df8dx4" beginning).
In theory you should be able to speed it up significantly e.g. with the "parallels" tool:
Well, and if you want that devs implement this into hashcat (with GPU support), then you shouldn't hesitate to open a github feature request. But there is still some information missing to be double-checked (see https://hashcat.net/faq#i_want_to_reques...plish_this). For instance, we should know exactly the max/min salt, wpky lengths, min/max iterations etc.
In theory you should be able to speed it up significantly e.g. with the "parallels" tool:
Code:
./hashcat --stdout -a 3 48df8dx4?a?a?a | parallel --pipe ./plisttohash.pl Manifest.plistWell, and if you want that devs implement this into hashcat (with GPU support), then you shouldn't hesitate to open a github feature request. But there is still some information missing to be double-checked (see https://hashcat.net/faq#i_want_to_reques...plish_this). For instance, we should know exactly the max/min salt, wpky lengths, min/max iterations etc.