02-07-2017, 10:20 PM
Thanks again, works great with hashcat-3.30+119 on Windows 10 x64.
I would suggest adjusting the reported hashrate though. I got very excited to see a huge speed bump and thought some new optimisation had been added...but then saw the same old rate benchmarking "hashcat -b". Then I twigged that the reported hashrate had tripled but only because there were three handshakes in the file... Estimated completion time remains the same.
E.g.
Bench (don't laugh, this is just fun for me):
Mask attack 8 UPPER:
I would suggest adjusting the reported hashrate though. I got very excited to see a huge speed bump and thought some new optimisation had been added...but then saw the same old rate benchmarking "hashcat -b". Then I twigged that the reported hashrate had tripled but only because there were three handshakes in the file... Estimated completion time remains the same.
E.g.
Bench (don't laugh, this is just fun for me):
Code:
OpenCL Platform #1: NVIDIA Corporation
======================================
* Device #1: GeForce GTX 760, 512/2048 MB allocatable, 6MCU
OpenCL Platform #2: Intel(R) Corporation
========================================
* Device #2: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-6700K CPU @ 4.00GHz, 2047/16323 MB allocatable, 8MCU
Hashtype: WPA/WPA2
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 26158 H/s (58.41ms)
Speed.Dev.#2.....: 14226 H/s (71.28ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....: 40384 H/sMask attack 8 UPPER:
Code:
Hash.Type........: WPA/WPA2
Hash.Target......: tst260ff.hccapx
Time.Started.....: Tue Feb 07 19:53:41 2017 (9 mins, 1 sec)
Time.Estimated...: Thu Apr 06 07:01:38 2017 (57 days, 9 hours)
Input.Mask.......: ?u?u?u?u?u?u?u?u [8]
Input.Queue......: 1/1 (100.00%)
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 79449 H/s (58.40ms)
Speed.Dev.#2.....: 46828 H/s (64.01ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....: 126.3 kH/s
Recovered........: 0/3 (0.00%) Digests, 0/3 (0.00%) Salts