Really????
Are you sure? Is this somewhere documented?
If this is the case, why? Maybe because the minimum length for WPA is 8 chars and so the code first rejects BEFORE the rule is applied?
If yes, shouldnt the rule FIRST be applied and then presented to the code to be tested?
In my opinion this is a serious problem as possibilities to retrieve passwords are lost.
If for example I know the first 6 characters and would like to apply a rule which would append at the end a range of 0-99999 how should I do it?
Furthermore, does this limitation also apply to wordlist combinations?
What if for example the password is "happyday" and wordlst #1 contains "happy" and wordlist #2 the word "day"? Does the combination of both wordlists crack or no the hash? (since each word is LESS than 8 chars?)
Are you sure? Is this somewhere documented?
If this is the case, why? Maybe because the minimum length for WPA is 8 chars and so the code first rejects BEFORE the rule is applied?
If yes, shouldnt the rule FIRST be applied and then presented to the code to be tested?
In my opinion this is a serious problem as possibilities to retrieve passwords are lost.
If for example I know the first 6 characters and would like to apply a rule which would append at the end a range of 0-99999 how should I do it?
Furthermore, does this limitation also apply to wordlist combinations?
What if for example the password is "happyday" and wordlst #1 contains "happy" and wordlist #2 the word "day"? Does the combination of both wordlists crack or no the hash? (since each word is LESS than 8 chars?)