No, you're not offtopic.
It is a well known bettercap issue, that should be fixed, now:
https://github.com/bettercap/bettercap/issues/592
Short explanation:
bettercap didn't store ESSID information, so there is nothing to convert by requested option -z or -k.
But there are 2 PMKIDs inside the cap file that can be verified via PMK (-m 16801) and they can be converted by options -Z or -K
If you need a longer explanation (inclusive packet analysis):
https://github.com/ZerBea/hcxtools/issues/110
https://github.com/ZerBea/hcxtools/issues/109
BTW:
Why don't you run hcxdumptool?
It has many advantages. For example this one:
https://github.com/ZerBea/hcxtools/issue...-532537154
Also it provides access point less attack vectors and weak candidate alerts.
It is a well known bettercap issue, that should be fixed, now:
https://github.com/bettercap/bettercap/issues/592
Short explanation:
bettercap didn't store ESSID information, so there is nothing to convert by requested option -z or -k.
But there are 2 PMKIDs inside the cap file that can be verified via PMK (-m 16801) and they can be converted by options -Z or -K
If you need a longer explanation (inclusive packet analysis):
https://github.com/ZerBea/hcxtools/issues/110
https://github.com/ZerBea/hcxtools/issues/109
BTW:
Why don't you run hcxdumptool?
It has many advantages. For example this one:
https://github.com/ZerBea/hcxtools/issue...-532537154
Also it provides access point less attack vectors and weak candidate alerts.