DrSnooker said:
"it needs at least 7 decimal places to get the last character"
"It needs to flag x.9999 as well as x.0001"
"assuming the first digit is base8 not base37"
"Note that these are the lowest entropy passwords in the collection"
You are definitely on the right track. I'm not sure if it matters, but I used x.9999999 and x.0000000, and I got similar results using either base8 or base37 on the first digit. I also used the "decimal" functions in Python, rather than floating the decimals. I'm not sure what that translates to in C++.
soxrok2212 said:
"I actually don't think you have a clue at all what you're talking about, especially since you've never actually proved you've broken it."
"Please if you have something to contribute then do it, but don't leave cryptic and meaningless rabbit holes for people to fall into because it's really evident you're just wasting people's time. Prove me wrong -- show us your source."
I have nothing but the deepest respect and admiration for all of the people here on the hashcat forum, with only one exception.
You, soxrok, and you alone, are the sole reason I have not released the 5268 seed. When Mrfancypants released his NVG-599 key-gen, you immediately jumped on it and re-released it in the form of your PSKracker, giving Mrfancypants absolutely no credit at all, and giving the impression that "you" were the original great creator. There is nothing I need to prove to you.
As some of you know, my crack station took a direct hit from a lightning bolt a year or two ago, and I haven't replaced it. Since then I've been dropping by from time to time just to help guide people down the right path in their attempts to crack the 5268 seed. I've been "teaching" people by "guiding" them for over twenty years. That's how people learn. If you just give them the answer, they've learned nothing.
But now it seems "it's really evident [I'm] just wasting people's time", so this time, I'll just stay gone. It's been a pleasure helping those who have actually put in a little effort.
"it needs at least 7 decimal places to get the last character"
"It needs to flag x.9999 as well as x.0001"
"assuming the first digit is base8 not base37"
"Note that these are the lowest entropy passwords in the collection"
You are definitely on the right track. I'm not sure if it matters, but I used x.9999999 and x.0000000, and I got similar results using either base8 or base37 on the first digit. I also used the "decimal" functions in Python, rather than floating the decimals. I'm not sure what that translates to in C++.
soxrok2212 said:
"I actually don't think you have a clue at all what you're talking about, especially since you've never actually proved you've broken it."
"Please if you have something to contribute then do it, but don't leave cryptic and meaningless rabbit holes for people to fall into because it's really evident you're just wasting people's time. Prove me wrong -- show us your source."
I have nothing but the deepest respect and admiration for all of the people here on the hashcat forum, with only one exception.
You, soxrok, and you alone, are the sole reason I have not released the 5268 seed. When Mrfancypants released his NVG-599 key-gen, you immediately jumped on it and re-released it in the form of your PSKracker, giving Mrfancypants absolutely no credit at all, and giving the impression that "you" were the original great creator. There is nothing I need to prove to you.
As some of you know, my crack station took a direct hit from a lightning bolt a year or two ago, and I haven't replaced it. Since then I've been dropping by from time to time just to help guide people down the right path in their attempts to crack the 5268 seed. I've been "teaching" people by "guiding" them for over twenty years. That's how people learn. If you just give them the answer, they've learned nothing.
But now it seems "it's really evident [I'm] just wasting people's time", so this time, I'll just stay gone. It's been a pleasure helping those who have actually put in a little effort.