Posts: 17
Threads: 3
Joined: Apr 2012
(04-25-2012, 04:50 PM)atom Wrote: The gtx680 is at 760 khash/s (estimated)
The hd7970 is at 3200 khash/s (latest beta)
Awesome
thanks.
Posts: 2
Threads: 0
Joined: Jul 2013
07-15-2013, 09:39 PM
(This post was last modified: 07-17-2013, 02:18 AM by mrfreshly.)
FTR: I'm seeing 29k/s with a ASUS Maximus VI Extreme + 4770K + GTX 680 running on The-Distribution-Which-Does-Not-Handle-OpenCL-Well (Kali) 1.0.3 64bit with the basic NVIDIA 304.88 drivers. Adjusting workload/loops I can eek out around 32k/s so far.
WPA/WPA2 on The-Distribution-Which-Does-Not-Handle-OpenCL-Well (Kali):
Code:
Workload: 16 loops, 8 accel
Watchdog: Temperature abort trigger set to 90c
Watchdog: Temperature retain trigger set to 80c
Device #1: GeForce GTX 680, 4095MB, 1058Mhz, 8MCU
Device #1: Kernel /usr/share/oclhashcat-plus/kernels/4318/m2500.sm_30.64.ptx
...
Hash.Type......: WPA/WPA2
Time.Started...: Mon Jul 15 12:07:34 2013 (6 mins, 4 secs)
Time.Estimated.: Mon Jul 15 12:50:55 2013 (37 mins, 15 secs)
Speed.GPU.#1...: 29196/s
SHA512 On Windows 7 64bit (I'll post The-Distribution-Which-Does-Not-Handle-OpenCL-Well (Kali) #s if it's much different)
Code:
cudaHashcat-plus v0.14 by atom starting...
Hashes: 1 total, 1 unique salts, 1 unique digests
Bitmaps: 8 bits, 256 entries, 0x000000ff mask, 1024 bytes
Workload: 16 loops, 2 accel
Watchdog: Temperature abort trigger set to 90c
Watchdog: Temperature retain trigger set to 80c
Device #1: GeForce GTX 680, 4096MB, 1058Mhz, 8MCU
Device #1: Kernel ./kernels/4318/m1800.sm_30.64.ptx
[s]tatus [p]ause [r]esume [b]ypass [q]uit =>
Session.Name...: cudaHashcat-plus
Status.........: Running
Input.Mode.....: Mask (?1?2?2?2)
Hash.Target....: $6$...
Hash.Type......: [b]sha512crypt, SHA512(Unix)[/b]
Time.Started...: Tue Jul 16 17:08:18 2013 (1 sec)
Time.Estimated.: Tue Jul 16 17:24:35 2013 (16 mins, 2 secs)
Speed.GPU.#1...: 7180/s
Regards,
Chris
Posts: 344
Threads: 2
Joined: Aug 2011
Because you cracking WPA/WPA2 and numbers posted are for MD5 ...
Posts: 2
Threads: 0
Joined: Jul 2013
07-17-2013, 02:06 AM
(07-16-2013, 07:50 AM)KT819GM Wrote: Because you cracking WPA/WPA2 and numbers posted are for MD5 ...
Yes, I didn't see anyone post WPA/WPA2 numbers for the GTX 680 so I posted my results from my new hardware. I'm not trying to compare WPA/WPA2 to MD5. Sorry for any confusion.
I'm pretty disappointed that this card is as slow as it is compared to some of the AMD cards. Anyone want to buy a GTX 680?
