oclHashcat-lite v0.10 release soon

[atom]

Beta-Testers,

oclHashcat-lite v0.10 is released soon. Please do some deep checks. All the changes made are as always in docs/changes.

--
atom

[atom]

OK, there was a huge bug on nvidia. All nvidia users reset to zero and download b92 and try again

[M@LIK]

That sounds good, because I had a long list of bugs for you.

[atom]

RC version (without beta-tag) is in /beta

[atom]

GUYS check it out, its in /beta.

Tomorrow is release.

[undeath]

it tries to read the hashcat.hcstat file from the cwd. If you run bf/markov from any other directory you just get "hashcat.hcstat: No such file or directory". Is this wanted?

Hash type naming is inconsistent. e.g. MD4 and md4($pass.$salt) or SHA256 and sha256($pass.$salt)

[M@LIK]

@undeath:: Works for me.
You just have to specify --markov-hcstat=[hcstat_file]. Or simply put your .hcstat file in the same directory and name it hashcat.hcstat

Hash type naming is inconsistent...

I don't understand what's wrong in that part... ?

[atom]

it tries to read the hashcat.hcstat file from the cwd. If you run bf/markov from any other directory you just get "hashcat.hcstat: No such file or directory". Is this wanted?

No actually its not. That was a good hint, I will change that.

Hash type naming is inconsistent. e.g. MD4 and md4($pass.$salt) or SHA256 and sha256($pass.$salt)

Yeah thats right, all hashcats are inconsistent like this. Thats why I didnt want to change it.

[atom]

it tries to read the hashcat.hcstat file from the cwd. If you run bf/markov from any other directory you just get "hashcat.hcstat: No such file or directory". Is this wanted?

No actually its not. That was a good hint, I will change that.

OK, fixed, new version is up. Pls try.