Posts: 6
	Threads: 3
	Joined: May 2010
	
	
 
	
	
		When trying to use -l and -s to split up a dictionary for distributed work I get... 
ERROR: parameter --words-limit is temporary unuseable
Also 
Is there way way to run a dictionary attack without applying mangle rules?
	
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 47
	Threads: 6
	Joined: Jul 2010
	
	
 
	
	
		crackbox can you paste your full command that you are using.
Also If you run with -a 0 or without the switch it defaults to straight attack mode. If you don't want to use rules just don't use -r switch.
	
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 6
	Threads: 3
	Joined: May 2010
	
	
 
	
	
		I apologize if these questions have already been answered but I couldn't find it in the docs / forum 
Part one (My Ignorance): 
This works just fine:
oclhashcat.exe  hash_file dictionary_file ?l
Doesn't:
oclhashcat.exe hash_file dictionary_file  
Is there a a way to make OCL pass all the way through the dictionary without appending
Part 2, Distributed: 
So this is the command that I want to be running:
oclhashcat.exe -s start_index -l stop_index hash_file dictionary_file 
but then it doesn't like no having a right side so I'm force to run: 
oclhashcat.exe -s start_index -l stop_index hash_file dictionary_file ?l   
and when I run that command it returns "ERROR: parameter --words-limit is temporary unuseable"
	
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 601
	Threads: 18
	Joined: Apr 2010
	
	
 
	
	
		Oclhashcat does not have simple wordlist attack, and will not have it in the future.
It's made for combo attack, with 2 sides.
So oclhashcat.exe hash_file dictionary_file will not work.
I have no idea why you cant distribute oclhc.
Maybe it was disabled by Atom.
	
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 47
	Threads: 6
	Joined: Jul 2010
	
	
 
	
	
		If you wanted to iterate through a giant dictionary without modifying the word you could just do:
oclHashcat.exe -m0 -j ] hashlist -1 ?l?u?s?d?h dictionary.dic ?1 
Basically the rule -j ]  takes the last letter off of the dictionary word while the ?1 bruteforces the last letter. So it adds it back on. Using regular hashcat should be just as fast.
	
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 6
	Threads: 3
	Joined: May 2010
	
	
 
	
	
		Oh okay, thanks for all your help. 
Now we just need atom to clear up the -l and -s for us.
	
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 5,232
	Threads: 233
	Joined: Apr 2010
	
	
 
	
	
		the parameter -l is currently not supported on oclhashcat. it requires a complicated rewrite of the scheduling engine. if you need distributed oclhashcat in wordlist-mode, you currently need to split them by hand (use split command).