oclHashcat-plus-0.13b3
#1
The beta only picks the 6900 Series to run.

Code:
$ fglrxinfo
display: :0.1  screen: 0
OpenGL vendor string: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
OpenGL renderer string: AMD Radeon HD 6800 Series  (6850)
OpenGL version string: 4.2.11762 Compatibility Profile Context

display: :0.1  screen: 1
OpenGL vendor string: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
OpenGL renderer string: AMD Radeon HD 6900 Series (6970)
OpenGL version string: 4.2.11762 Compatibility Profile Context

Code:
~/oclhcp013b3$ ./plus64.bin -a 3 -m 1500 --gpu-accel=8 --gpu-loops=256 --outfile-format=2 -o top100.txt ../hashes/00des.all.left.hc.130101.txt.100 -1 ?u?l?d ?1?1?1?1?1?100
oclHashcat-plus v0.13 by atom starting...

Hashes: 3329799 total, 100 unique salts, 3329799 unique digests
Bitmaps: 21 bits, 1048576 entries, 0x000fffff mask, 4194304 bytes
Workload: 256 loops, 8 accel
Watchdog: Temperature abort trigger set to 90c
Watchdog: Temperature retain trigger set to 80c
Device #1: Cayman, 1024MB, 850Mhz, 24MCU
Device #1: Kernel ./kernels/4098/m1500_a3.Cayman_938.2_CAL 1.4.1741.kernel not found in cache! Building may take a while...
Device #1: Kernel ./kernels/4098/m1500_a3.Cayman_938.2_CAL 1.4.1741.kernel (685596 bytes)

I do not have this problem using oclHashcat-plus-0.12.
Code:
~/oclhcp012$ ./oclHashcat-plus64.bin -a 3 --outfile-format=2 --gpu-accel=8 --gpu-loops=512 -m 1500 -o alldes130101.txt ../hashes/00des.*.130101.txt -1 ?u?l?d?s ?1?1?1?1?l
oclHashcat-plus v0.12 by atom starting...

Hashes: 4938137 total, 4096 unique salts, 4938137 unique digests
Bitmaps: 21 bits, 1048576 entries, 0x000fffff mask, 4194304 bytes
Workload: 512 loops, 8 accel
Watchdog: Temperature abort trigger set to 90c
Watchdog: Temperature retain trigger set to 80c
Device #1: Barts, 512MB, 850Mhz, 12MCU
Device #2: Cayman, 1024MB, 850Mhz, 24MCU
Device #1: Kernel ./kernels/4098/m1500_a3.Barts_938.2_CAL 1.4.1741.kernel (653080 bytes)
Device #2: Kernel ./kernels/4098/m1500_a3.Cayman_938.2_CAL 1.4.1741.kernel (685596 bytes)
Reply
#2
export DISPLAY=:0

That should solve it
Reply