Posts: 44
	Threads: 7
	Joined: May 2010
	
	
 
	
	
		I just upgraded from 18 all the way to 21 and i've dropped down to a FRACTION of the speed. Now (with one nvidia 275 and one 260) i can barely do 100m hashes per sec with BOTH cards where with 18 i was doing over 900m hashes per sec.
wth happened????????????
	
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 44
	Threads: 7
	Joined: May 2010
	
	
 
	
	
		Welp, just upgraded to the latest bleeding edge nvidia drivers 257.21 (CUDA 3.1.1) and still get about 112m md5 per second. Abysmal compared to 900m+. Perhaps I'm doing something wrong, some new config option?
I should mention my hashlist is hovering around 4 million hashes (md5).
	
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 5,232
	Threads: 233
	Joined: Apr 2010
	
	
 
	
	
		please paste speed of v0.18 with this command:
oclHashcat.exe example.hash -1 ?l?d ?1?1?1?1 ?1?1?1?1 -n 8
and of v0.21 with this command:
oclHashcat.exe example.hash -1 ?l?d ?1?1?1?1 ?1?1?1?1 -n 8 --gpu-loops 1024
	
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 44
	Threads: 7
	Joined: May 2010
	
	
 
	
	
		 (06-24-2010, 04:04 PM)atom Wrote:  please paste speed of v0.18 with this command:
oclHashcat.exe example.hash -1 ?l?d ?1?1?1?1 ?1?1?1?1 -n 8
and of v0.21 with this command:
oclHashcat.exe example.hash -1 ?l?d ?1?1?1?1 ?1?1?1?1 -n 8 --gpu-loops 1024
The speed it exactly the same for both (>1000m/sec) which is good. I've discovered that it is the size of my md5 hashlist that is slowing oclhashcat down TREMENDOUSLY. 3 million hashes slow it down to a crawl of 100m/sec when i chop the list in half to 1.5 million hashes, the speed jumps up to 500m/sec, etc... This was not the case with .18.
	
 
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 601
	Threads: 18
	Joined: Apr 2010
	
	
 
	
	
		Latest OCLHC is optimized to handle up to 0.5M hashes.
	
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 44
	Threads: 7
	Joined: May 2010
	
	
 
	
	
		 (06-28-2010, 09:48 AM)Rolf Wrote:  Latest OCLHC is optimized to handle up to 0.5M hashes.
Hmm, it was becoming apparent that the latest version was optimized for lower numbers of hashes. Guess that gives me a reason to keep the old versions around then....
	
 
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 5,232
	Threads: 233
	Joined: Apr 2010