Poll: Rule or BF?
This poll is closed.
Do it! Rules need to be faster
84.21%
16 84.21%
Don't! Everything should stay as-is
15.79%
3 15.79%
Total 19 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Please vote
#1
I can increase rule-based attack speed but for the price of a decreased brute-force attack speed.

I can not guarantee the numbers, but after the change all modes will have the same speed.

The speed will be slower to what combinator-mode is doing right now and depend on the hash-mode.

For NTLM, only half the speed of combinator attack
For SHA256, almost the same speed of combinator attack

Note: This is for fast hashes (NTLM, MD5, VB, etc) only. Slow hashes speeds don't change.
Reply
#2
I'm in favor of the trade off.
Reply
#3
TRADE OFF!
Reply
#4
Faster rules all day.
Reply
#5
Yeah! New algo!



No, wait. Wrong thread.



Yes, do it atom :-)
Reply
#6
For those haven't seen it: There's a voting system on top of this thread
Reply
#7
I'm in favour but, its a shame brute-force it taking a hit. I presume the classes / interfaces are linked in hashcat which is why this is causing this to happen?

Back in the old days, hashcat was split into 2 apps. Because of this, this issue would never occur.

Surely hashcat can accommodate this without a sacrifice? Is it not the crackers way for speed! Smile I do realise it would be a lot of work but worth it and we would have the best of both worlds.
Owner of: www.md5decrypter.co.uk
Reply
#8
Why brute-force attack speed will decrease after changes?
Reply
#9
Brute force is for noobs.
Reply
#10
OK, poll is closed now. Bad thing is that I've found in the meanwhile that the idea didn't work out, so everything will stay as-is Smile
Reply