Posts: 100
Threads: 34
Joined: Aug 2014
Does anyone have benchmarks for the GTX 1050, the GTX 1060, and the GTX 970 all in one place?
I am considering additional GPUs for my rig and these are priced low, relative to the 1070 and 1080, of course.
Is the GTX 1050 even a contender for running hashcat?
What is the current optimal setup in terms of cost and performance?
Posts: 5,185
Threads: 230
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 259
Threads: 13
Joined: Jun 2016
their is yes but i dont remmber where, i shared a link to 1060 1070 1080 and gtx 970.
use the search , or look into some of my posts
Posts: 87
Threads: 4
Joined: Dec 2015
12-07-2016, 07:01 PM
(This post was last modified: 12-07-2016, 07:03 PM by jodler303.)
some 1070,1080,980,970,960,etc. benchmarks for WPA are here: http://www.crackingservice.com/?q=node/20
i personally wouldn't consider anything below 1070 but that is just my very personal humble opinion.
Posts: 5,185
Threads: 230
Joined: Apr 2010
Note, these benchmarks were made on a very old hashcat version. Results may vary extremely to todays hashcat version.
Posts: 6
Threads: 1
Joined: Dec 2016
(12-07-2016, 07:01 PM)jodler303 Wrote: i personally wouldn't consider anything below 1070 but that is just my very personal humble opinion.
Hi!
Pure performance of 1070 is higher than 1060 or 1050.
But performance/price ratio may be more important.
For example here is prices from my nearest pc-shop.
gtx 1060 cost 220 usd and gtx 1070 cost 460 usd.
So cheaper to get 2x1060 and get higher h/s rate than 1x1070 could get.
GTX 1060 benchmark is here https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-5674-po...l#pid30574
GTX 1070 benchmark is here [/url][url=https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-5440-post-30016.html#pid30016]https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-5440-post-30016.html#pid30016
both based on 3.0 version of hashcat.
It would be nice if someone could share GTX 1050 results!
Thanks!
Posts: 23
Threads: 3
Joined: Dec 2016
(12-28-2016, 12:57 PM)marpolo Wrote: (12-07-2016, 07:01 PM)jodler303 Wrote: i personally wouldn't consider anything below 1070 but that is just my very personal humble opinion.
Hi!
Pure performance of 1070 is higher than 1060 or 1050.
But performance/price ratio may be more important.
For example here is prices from my nearest pc-shop.
gtx 1060 cost 220 usd and gtx 1070 cost 460 usd.
So cheaper to get 2x1060 and get higher h/s rate than 1x1070 could get.
GTX 1060 benchmark is here https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-5674-po...l#pid30574
GTX 1070 benchmark is here [/url][url=https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-5440-post-30016.html#pid30016]https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-5440-post-30016.html#pid30016
both based on 3.0 version of hashcat.
It would be nice if someone could share GTX 1050 results!
Thanks!
I just installed a GTX 1050 Ti today. How do you guys share benchmark data? just hashcat -b and paste? Or do you include CPU and RAM info?
I'm cracking a WPA/WPA2 hash type right now at 112.8 kH/s on a 8 year old Dell Core 2 Duo at 2.13gHz.
Posts: 6
Threads: 1
Joined: Dec 2016
(12-29-2016, 02:51 AM)duhblow7 Wrote: (12-28-2016, 12:57 PM)marpolo Wrote: (12-07-2016, 07:01 PM)jodler303 Wrote: i personally wouldn't consider anything below 1070 but that is just my very personal humble opinion.
Hi!
Pure performance of 1070 is higher than 1060 or 1050.
But performance/price ratio may be more important.
For example here is prices from my nearest pc-shop.
gtx 1060 cost 220 usd and gtx 1070 cost 460 usd.
So cheaper to get 2x1060 and get higher h/s rate than 1x1070 could get.
GTX 1060 benchmark is here https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-5674-po...l#pid30574
GTX 1070 benchmark is here [/url][url=https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-5440-post-30016.html#pid30016]https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-5440-post-30016.html#pid30016
both based on 3.0 version of hashcat.
It would be nice if someone could share GTX 1050 results!
Thanks!
I just installed a GTX 1050 Ti today. How do you guys share benchmark data? just hashcat -b and paste? Or do you include CPU and RAM info?
I'm cracking a WPA/WPA2 hash type right now at 112.8 kH/s on a 8 year old Dell Core 2 Duo at 2.13gHz.
Hi!
Thanks for 1050 TI results sharing!
Correct links now are:
GTX 1050 TI
https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-6167-po...l#pid32836
GTX 1060 benchmark is here
https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-5674-po...l#pid30574
GTX 1070 benchmark is here
https://paste2.org/Uv1s0KBx
https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-5440-po...l#pid30016
Posts: 27
Threads: 8
Joined: Nov 2015
10-15-2017, 03:07 PM
(This post was last modified: 10-16-2017, 01:08 PM by n_lona.)
(12-28-2016, 12:57 PM)marpolo Wrote: (12-07-2016, 07:01 PM)jodler303 Wrote: i personally wouldn't consider anything below 1070 but that is just my very personal humble opinion.
Hi!
Pure performance of 1070 is higher than 1060 or 1050.
But performance/price ratio may be more important.
For example here is prices from my nearest pc-shop.
gtx 1060 cost 220 usd and gtx 1070 cost 460 usd.
So cheaper to get 2x1060 and get higher h/s rate than 1x1070 could get.
GTX 1060 benchmark is here https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-5674-po...l#pid30574
GTX 1070 benchmark is here [/url][url=https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-5440-post-30016.html#pid30016]https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-5440-post-30016.html#pid30016
both based on 3.0 version of hashcat.
It would be nice if someone could share GTX 1050 results!
Thanks!
Here is
Code: hp@hp-desktop:~$ sudo /home/hp/hashcat-3.6.0/hashcat64.bin -b -I
hashcat (v3.6.0) starting in benchmark mode...
OpenCL Info:
Platform ID #1
Vendor : NVIDIA Corporation
Name : NVIDIA CUDA
Version : OpenCL 1.2 CUDA 9.0.194
Device ID #1
Type : GPU
Vendor ID : 32
Vendor : NVIDIA Corporation
Name : GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Version : OpenCL 1.2 CUDA
Processor(s) : 6
Clock : 1392
Memory : 1009/4038 MB allocatable
OpenCL Version : OpenCL C 1.2
Driver Version : 384.90
hp@hp-desktop:~$ sudo /home/hp/hashcat-3.6.0/hashcat64.bin -b
hashcat (v3.6.0) starting in benchmark mode...
OpenCL Platform #1: NVIDIA Corporation
======================================
* Device #1: GeForce GTX 1050 Ti, 1009/4038 MB allocatable, 6MCU
Hashtype: MD4
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 10698.0 MH/s (75.21ms)
Hashtype: MD5
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 6043.7 MH/s (66.57ms)
Hashtype: Half MD5
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 4091.5 MH/s (49.14ms)
Hashtype: SHA1
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 2293.7 MH/s (87.71ms)
Hashtype: SHA-256
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 857.7 MH/s (58.38ms)
Hashtype: SHA-384
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 267.4 MH/s (94.00ms)
Hashtype: SHA-512
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 300.3 MH/s (83.73ms)
Hashtype: SHA-3 (Keccak)
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 237.5 MH/s (52.81ms)
Hashtype: SipHash
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 8200.2 MH/s (49.04ms)
Hashtype: Skip32 (PT = $salt, key = $pass)
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 1524.0 MH/s (21.96ms)
Hashtype: RIPEMD-160
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 1357.6 MH/s (74.09ms)
Hashtype: Whirlpool
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 68231.5 kH/s (184.12ms)
Hashtype: GOST R 34.11-94
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 67436.2 kH/s (93.24ms)
Hashtype: GOST R 34.11-2012 (Streebog) 256-bit
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 13438.0 kH/s (231.29ms)
Hashtype: GOST R 34.11-2012 (Streebog) 512-bit
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 13899.3 kH/s (223.61ms)
Hashtype: DES (PT = $salt, key = $pass)
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 5667.7 MH/s (70.94ms)
Hashtype: 3DES (PT = $salt, key = $pass)
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 144.1 MH/s (87.29ms)
Hashtype: phpass, WordPress (MD5), phpBB3 (MD5), Joomla (MD5)
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 1862.2 kH/s (52.12ms)
Hashtype: scrypt
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 233.0 kH/s (54.48ms)
Hashtype: PBKDF2-HMAC-MD5
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 2033.1 kH/s (63.08ms)
Hashtype: PBKDF2-HMAC-SHA1
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 906.6 kH/s (44.65ms)
Hashtype: PBKDF2-HMAC-SHA256
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 334.0 kH/s (63.66ms)
Hashtype: PBKDF2-HMAC-SHA512
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 129.4 kH/s (88.61ms)
Hashtype: Skype
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 3581.2 MH/s (56.09ms)
Hashtype: WPA/WPA2
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 109.1 kH/s (55.99ms)
Hashtype: IKE-PSK MD5
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 537.8 MH/s (93.16ms)
Hashtype: IKE-PSK SHA1
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 226.8 MH/s (55.37ms)
Hashtype: NetNTLMv1 / NetNTLMv1+ESS
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 6152.8 MH/s (65.39ms)
Hashtype: NetNTLMv2
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 486.4 MH/s (51.69ms)
Hashtype: IPMI2 RAKP HMAC-SHA1
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 479.5 MH/s (52.44ms)
Hashtype: Kerberos 5 AS-REQ Pre-Auth etype 23
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 78690.4 kH/s (79.92ms)
Hashtype: Kerberos 5 TGS-REP etype 23
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 78866.0 kH/s (79.71ms)
Hashtype: DNSSEC (NSEC3)
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 948.3 MH/s (52.80ms)
Hashtype: PostgreSQL CRAM (MD5)
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 1909.0 MH/s (52.69ms)
Hashtype: MySQL CRAM (SHA1)
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 658.7 MH/s (76.06ms)
Hashtype: SIP digest authentication (MD5)
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 970.7 MH/s (51.57ms)
Hashtype: SMF (Simple Machines Forum) > v1.1
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 1958.6 MH/s (51.31ms)
Hashtype: vBulletin < v3.8.5
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 1912.6 MH/s (52.57ms)
Hashtype: vBulletin >= v3.8.5
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 1352.8 MH/s (74.34ms)
Hashtype: IPB2+ (Invision Power Board), MyBB 1.2+
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 1373.6 MH/s (73.25ms)
Hashtype: WBB3 (Woltlab Burning Board)
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 372.3 MH/s (67.54ms)
Hashtype: OpenCart
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 598.7 MH/s (83.67ms)
Hashtype: Joomla < 2.5.18
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 6037.9 MH/s (66.64ms)
Hashtype: PHPS
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 1935.5 MH/s (51.97ms)
Hashtype: Drupal7
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 16217 H/s (94.43ms)
Hashtype: osCommerce, xt:Commerce
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 3772.1 MH/s (53.33ms)
Hashtype: PrestaShop
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 2381.1 MH/s (84.47ms)
Hashtype: Django (SHA-1)
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 1930.6 MH/s (52.09ms)
Hashtype: Django (PBKDF2-SHA256)
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 17470 H/s (71.81ms)
Hashtype: MediaWiki B type
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 1814.4 MH/s (55.39ms)
Hashtype: Redmine
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 794.3 MH/s (63.05ms)
Hashtype: PunBB
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 783.7 MH/s (63.91ms)
Hashtype: PostgreSQL
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 6126.1 MH/s (65.65ms)
Hashtype: MSSQL (2000)
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 2345.0 MH/s (85.78ms)
Hashtype: MSSQL (2005)
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 2289.4 MH/s (87.88ms)
Hashtype: MSSQL (2012, 2014)
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 274.7 MH/s (91.46ms)
Hashtype: MySQL323
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 12782.8 MH/s (62.89ms)
Hashtype: MySQL4.1/MySQL5
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 1009.1 MH/s (49.62ms)
Hashtype: Oracle H: Type (Oracle 7+)
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 262.4 MH/s (95.84ms)
Hashtype: Oracle S: Type (Oracle 11+)
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 2208.3 MH/s (91.10ms)
Hashtype: Oracle T: Type (Oracle 12+)
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 29732 H/s (51.48ms)
Hashtype: Sybase ASE
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 74957.2 kH/s (83.89ms)
Hashtype: Episerver 6.x < .NET 4
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 1955.4 MH/s (51.44ms)
Hashtype: Episerver 6.x >= .NET 4
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 729.4 MH/s (68.68ms)
Hashtype: Apache $apr1$ MD5, md5apr1, MD5 (APR)
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 2862.7 kH/s (67.50ms)
Hashtype: ColdFusion 10+
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 485.4 MH/s (51.77ms)
Hashtype: hMailServer
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 762.1 MH/s (65.74ms)
Hashtype: nsldap, SHA-1(Base64), Netscape LDAP SHA
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 2259.4 MH/s (89.04ms)
Hashtype: nsldaps, SSHA-1(Base64), Netscape LDAP SSHA
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 2301.3 MH/s (87.41ms)
Hashtype: SSHA-256(Base64), LDAP {SSHA256}
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 852.1 MH/s (58.75ms)
Hashtype: SSHA-512(Base64), LDAP {SSHA512}
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 286.7 MH/s (87.68ms)
Hashtype: LM
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 5660.6 MH/s (71.02ms)
Hashtype: NTLM
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 10465.7 MH/s (76.88ms)
Hashtype: Domain Cached Credentials (DCC), MS Cache
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 3035.9 MH/s (66.25ms)
Hashtype: Domain Cached Credentials 2 (DCC2), MS Cache 2
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 93667 H/s (51.34ms)
Hashtype: DPAPI masterkey file v1 and v2
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 20129 H/s (51.93ms)
Hashtype: MS-AzureSync PBKDF2-HMAC-SHA256
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 2940.0 kH/s (54.81ms)
Hashtype: descrypt, DES (Unix), Traditional DES
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 272.9 MH/s (92.01ms)
Hashtype: BSDi Crypt, Extended DES
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 420.8 kH/s (77.36ms)
Hashtype: md5crypt, MD5 (Unix), Cisco-IOS $1$ (MD5)
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 2969.0 kH/s (65.11ms)
Hashtype: bcrypt $2*$, Blowfish (Unix)
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 4104 H/s (45.67ms)
Hashtype: sha256crypt $5$, SHA256 (Unix)
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 110.5 kH/s (88.16ms)
Hashtype: sha512crypt $6$, SHA512 (Unix)
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 44992 H/s (55.15ms)
Hashtype: OSX v10.4, OSX v10.5, OSX v10.6
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 1939.3 MH/s (51.87ms)
Hashtype: OSX v10.7
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 265.1 MH/s (94.90ms)
Hashtype: OSX v10.8+ (PBKDF2-SHA512)
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 3622 H/s (49.12ms)
Hashtype: AIX {smd5}
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 2995.5 kH/s (64.60ms)
Hashtype: AIX {ssha1}
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 13343.8 kH/s (51.90ms)
Hashtype: AIX {ssha256}
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 4954.5 kH/s (74.50ms)
Hashtype: AIX {ssha512}
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 1893.6 kH/s (48.82ms)
Hashtype: Cisco-PIX MD5
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 4547.7 MH/s (88.50ms)
Hashtype: Cisco-ASA MD5
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 4551.7 MH/s (88.38ms)
Hashtype: Cisco-IOS type 4 (SHA256)
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 885.2 MH/s (56.59ms)
Hashtype: Cisco-IOS $8$ (PBKDF2-SHA256)
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 17456 H/s (71.91ms)
Hashtype: Cisco-IOS $9$ (scrypt)
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 5357 H/s (1431.75ms)
Hashtype: Juniper NetScreen/SSG (ScreenOS)
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 3742.3 MH/s (53.72ms)
Hashtype: Juniper IVE
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 2947.7 kH/s (65.65ms)
Hashtype: Samsung Android Password/PIN
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 1572.9 kH/s (61.95ms)
Hashtype: Citrix NetScaler
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 2067.9 MH/s (48.63ms)
Hashtype: RACF
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 704.2 MH/s (71.42ms)
Hashtype: GRUB 2
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 12762 H/s (49.10ms)
Hashtype: Radmin2
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 2268.0 MH/s (88.69ms)
Hashtype: SAP CODVN B (BCODE)
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 674.9 MH/s (74.18ms)
Hashtype: SAP CODVN F/G (PASSCODE)
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 322.1 MH/s (78.03ms)
Hashtype: SAP CODVN H (PWDSALTEDHASH) iSSHA-1
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 1727.8 kH/s (56.28ms)
Hashtype: Lotus Notes/Domino 5
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 60821.7 kH/s (103.41ms)
Hashtype: Lotus Notes/Domino 6
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 19998.8 kH/s (78.61ms)
Hashtype: Lotus Notes/Domino 8
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 186.6 kH/s (52.14ms)
Hashtype: PeopleSoft
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 2317.7 MH/s (86.81ms)
Hashtype: PeopleSoft PS_TOKEN
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 871.1 MH/s (57.50ms)
Hashtype: 7-Zip
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 2715 H/s (70.60ms)
Hashtype: WinZip
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 302.7 kH/s (70.55ms)
Hashtype: RAR3-hp
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 10090 H/s (75.99ms)
Hashtype: RAR5
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 10385 H/s (73.78ms)
Hashtype: AxCrypt
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 32222 H/s (155.36ms)
Hashtype: AxCrypt in-memory SHA1
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 2175.7 MH/s (92.47ms)
Hashtype: TrueCrypt PBKDF2-HMAC-RIPEMD160 + XTS 512 bit
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 77802 H/s (74.89ms)
Hashtype: TrueCrypt PBKDF2-HMAC-SHA512 + XTS 512 bit
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 119.0 kH/s (89.50ms)
Hashtype: TrueCrypt PBKDF2-HMAC-Whirlpool + XTS 512 bit
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 10012 H/s (151.67ms)
Hashtype: TrueCrypt PBKDF2-HMAC-RIPEMD160 + XTS 512 bit + boot-mode
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 149.4 kH/s (68.33ms)
Hashtype: VeraCrypt PBKDF2-HMAC-RIPEMD160 + XTS 512 bit
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 217 H/s (77.76ms)
Hashtype: VeraCrypt PBKDF2-HMAC-SHA512 + XTS 512 bit
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 249 H/s (48.82ms)
Hashtype: VeraCrypt PBKDF2-HMAC-Whirlpool + XTS 512 bit
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 0 H/s (151.49ms)
Hashtype: VeraCrypt PBKDF2-HMAC-RIPEMD160 + XTS 512 bit + boot-mode
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 491 H/s (76.80ms)
Hashtype: VeraCrypt PBKDF2-HMAC-SHA256 + XTS 512 bit
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 310 H/s (76.27ms)
Hashtype: VeraCrypt PBKDF2-HMAC-SHA256 + XTS 512 bit + boot-mode
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 801 H/s (76.80ms)
Hashtype: Android FDE <= 4.3
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 233.2 kH/s (51.85ms)
Hashtype: Android FDE (Samsung DEK)
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 83722 H/s (72.98ms)
Hashtype: eCryptfs
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 3897 H/s (48.73ms)
Hashtype: MS Office <= 2003 $0/$1, MD5 + RC4
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 71987.1 kH/s (87.33ms)
Hashtype: MS Office <= 2003 $0/$1, MD5 + RC4, collider #1
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 89411.7 kH/s (70.32ms)
Hashtype: MS Office <= 2003 $3/$4, SHA1 + RC4
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 87011.5 kH/s (72.26ms)
Hashtype: MS Office <= 2003 $3, SHA1 + RC4, collider #1
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 95633.7 kH/s (65.70ms)
Hashtype: MS Office 2007
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 37795 H/s (53.19ms)
Hashtype: MS Office 2010
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 18778 H/s (53.47ms)
Hashtype: MS Office 2013
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 2586 H/s (96.58ms)
Hashtype: PDF 1.1 - 1.3 (Acrobat 2 - 4)
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 98785.6 kH/s (63.61ms)
Hashtype: PDF 1.1 - 1.3 (Acrobat 2 - 4), collider #1
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 110.2 MH/s (57.02ms)
Hashtype: PDF 1.4 - 1.6 (Acrobat 5 - 8)
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 4767.0 kH/s (39.94ms)
Hashtype: PDF 1.7 Level 3 (Acrobat 9)
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 875.8 MH/s (57.20ms)
Hashtype: PDF 1.7 Level 8 (Acrobat 10 - 11)
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 11784 H/s (217.10ms)
Hashtype: Password Safe v2
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 91821 H/s (42.19ms)
Hashtype: Password Safe v3
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 343.2 kH/s (64.91ms)
Hashtype: LastPass + LastPass sniffed
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 656.4 kH/s (54.64ms)
Hashtype: 1Password, agilekeychain
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 951.4 kH/s (50.91ms)
Hashtype: 1Password, cloudkeychain
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 3132 H/s (49.63ms)
Hashtype: Bitcoin/Litecoin wallet.dat
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 1276 H/s (48.31ms)
Hashtype: Blockchain, My Wallet
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 22679.1 kH/s (17.00ms)
Hashtype: Blockchain, My Wallet, V2
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 95245 H/s (51.43ms)
Hashtype: KeePass 1 (AES/Twofish) and KeePass 2 (AES)
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 38223 H/s (219.19ms)
Hashtype: JKS Java Key Store Private Keys (SHA1)
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 2094.1 MH/s (47.94ms)
Hashtype: Ethereum Wallet, PBKDF2-HMAC-SHA256
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 1271 H/s (74.88ms)
Hashtype: ArubaOS
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 1848.9 MH/s (54.38ms)
Hashtype: ChaCha20
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 1271.1 MH/s (79.07ms)
But if you pipe in maskprocessor, this would be your rates
Code: hp@hp-desktop:~$ ./maskprocessor-master/src/mp64.bin -i 8:64 -1 ?l?u?d ?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1 -s aaabVSF2|/home/hp/hashcat-3.6.0/hashcat64.bin -w 3 -m 2500 x.hccapx --force
hashcat (v3.6.0) starting...
OpenCL Platform #1: NVIDIA Corporation
======================================
* Device #1: GeForce GTX 1050 Ti, 1009/4038 MB allocatable, 6MCU
Hashes: 78 digests; 53 unique digests, 1 unique salts
Bitmaps: 16 bits, 65536 entries, 0x0000ffff mask, 262144 bytes, 5/13 rotates
Rules: 1
Applicable optimizers:
* Zero-Byte
* Single-Salt
* Slow-Hash-SIMD
Watchdog: Temperature abort trigger set to 90c
Watchdog: Temperature retain trigger disabled.
Starting attack in stdin mode...
Session..........: hashcat
Status...........: Running
Hash.Type........: WPA/WPA2
Hash.Target......: x.hccapx
Time.Started.....: Sun Oct 15 15:09:48 2017 (9 secs)
Time.Estimated...: Sun Oct 15 15:09:57 2017 (0 secs)
Guess.Base.......: Pipe
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 65135 H/s (52.77ms)
Recovered........: 0/53 (0.00%) Digests, 0/1 (0.00%) Salts
Progress.........: 196608
Rejected.........: 0
Restore.Point....: 0
Candidates.#1....: aaabWHO8 -> aaabXwYd
HWMon.Dev.#1.....: Temp: 34c Fan: 56% Util:100% Core:1771MHz Mem:3504MHz Bus:16
Session..........: hashcat
Status...........: Running
Hash.Type........: WPA/WPA2
Hash.Target......: x.hccapx
Time.Started.....: Sun Oct 15 15:09:48 2017 (19 secs)
Time.Estimated...: Sun Oct 15 15:10:07 2017 (0 secs)
Guess.Base.......: Pipe
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 49365 H/s (53.05ms)
Recovered........: 0/53 (0.00%) Digests, 0/1 (0.00%) Salts
Progress.........: 786432
Rejected.........: 0
Restore.Point....: 0
Candidates.#1....: aaabZbgq -> aaabZ0pv
HWMon.Dev.#1.....: Temp: 44c Fan: 56% Util:100% Core:1759MHz Mem:3504MHz Bus:16
Session..........: hashcat
Status...........: Running
Hash.Type........: WPA/WPA2
Hash.Target......: x.hccapx
Time.Started.....: Sun Oct 15 15:09:48 2017 (29 secs)
Time.Estimated...: Sun Oct 15 15:10:17 2017 (0 secs)
Guess.Base.......: Pipe
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 49563 H/s (53.22ms)
Recovered........: 0/53 (0.00%) Digests, 0/1 (0.00%) Salts
Progress.........: 1179648
Rejected.........: 0
Restore.Point....: 0
Candidates.#1....: aaab0PyC -> aaab1EHH
HWMon.Dev.#1.....: Temp: 38c Fan: 56% Util:100% Core:1759MHz Mem:3504MHz Bus:16
Session..........: hashcat
Status...........: Running
Hash.Type........: WPA/WPA2
Hash.Target......: x.hccapx
Time.Started.....: Sun Oct 15 15:09:48 2017 (39 secs)
Time.Estimated...: Sun Oct 15 15:10:27 2017 (0 secs)
Guess.Base.......: Pipe
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 48440 H/s (53.51ms)
Recovered........: 0/53 (0.00%) Digests, 0/1 (0.00%) Salts
Progress.........: 1572864
Rejected.........: 0
Restore.Point....: 0
Candidates.#1....: aaab2tQO -> aaab3iZT
HWMon.Dev.#1.....: Temp: 39c Fan: 56% Util:100% Core:1759MHz Mem:3504MHz Bus:16
Session..........: hashcat
Status...........: Running
Hash.Type........: WPA/WPA2
Hash.Target......: x.hccapx
Time.Started.....: Sun Oct 15 15:09:48 2017 (49 secs)
Time.Estimated...: Sun Oct 15 15:10:37 2017 (0 secs)
Guess.Base.......: Pipe
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 45820 H/s (53.57ms)
Recovered........: 0/53 (0.00%) Digests, 0/1 (0.00%) Salts
Progress.........: 2162688
Rejected.........: 0
Restore.Point....: 0
Candidates.#1....: aaab4Xh6 -> aaab5Mrb
HWMon.Dev.#1.....: Temp: 48c Fan: 56% Util:100% Core:1759MHz Mem:3504MHz Bus:16
Session..........: hashcat
Status...........: Running
Hash.Type........: WPA/WPA2
Hash.Target......: x.hccapx
Time.Started.....: Sun Oct 15 15:09:48 2017 (59 secs)
Time.Estimated...: Sun Oct 15 15:10:47 2017 (0 secs)
Guess.Base.......: Pipe
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 47068 H/s (53.42ms)
Recovered........: 0/53 (0.00%) Digests, 0/1 (0.00%) Salts
Progress.........: 2555904
Rejected.........: 0
Restore.Point....: 0
Candidates.#1....: aaab6BAi -> aaab7qJn
HWMon.Dev.#1.....: Temp: 43c Fan: 56% Util:100% Core:1759MHz Mem:3504MHz Bus:16
Session..........: hashcat
Status...........: Running
Hash.Type........: WPA/WPA2
Hash.Target......: x.hccapx
Time.Started.....: Sun Oct 15 15:09:48 2017 (1 min, 9 secs)
Time.Estimated...: Sun Oct 15 15:10:57 2017 (0 secs)
Guess.Base.......: Pipe
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 46819 H/s (53.34ms)
Recovered........: 0/53 (0.00%) Digests, 0/1 (0.00%) Salts
Progress.........: 2949120
Rejected.........: 0
Restore.Point....: 0
Candidates.#1....: aaab8fSu -> aaab841z
HWMon.Dev.#1.....: Temp: 42c Fan: 56% Util:100% Core:1759MHz Mem:3504MHz Bus:16
Session..........: hashcat
Status...........: Running
Hash.Type........: WPA/WPA2
Hash.Target......: x.hccapx
Time.Started.....: Sun Oct 15 15:09:48 2017 (1 min, 19 secs)
Time.Estimated...: Sun Oct 15 15:11:07 2017 (0 secs)
Guess.Base.......: Pipe
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 45225 H/s (53.47ms)
Recovered........: 0/53 (0.00%) Digests, 0/1 (0.00%) Salts
Progress.........: 3538944
Rejected.........: 0
Restore.Point....: 0
Candidates.#1....: aaacaJjM -> aaacbysR
HWMon.Dev.#1.....: Temp: 49c Fan: 56% Util: 99% Core:1759MHz Mem:3504MHz Bus:16
Session..........: hashcat
Status...........: Running
Hash.Type........: WPA/WPA2
Hash.Target......: x.hccapx
Time.Started.....: Sun Oct 15 15:09:48 2017 (1 min, 29 secs)
Time.Estimated...: Sun Oct 15 15:11:17 2017 (0 secs)
Guess.Base.......: Pipe
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 46205 H/s (53.47ms)
Recovered........: 0/53 (0.00%) Digests, 0/1 (0.00%) Salts
Progress.........: 3932160
Rejected.........: 0
Restore.Point....: 0
Candidates.#1....: aaaccnBY -> aaacdcK3
HWMon.Dev.#1.....: Temp: 52c Fan: 56% Util:100% Core:1746MHz Mem:3504MHz Bus:16
Session..........: hashcat
Status...........: Running
Hash.Type........: WPA/WPA2
Hash.Target......: x.hccapx
Time.Started.....: Sun Oct 15 15:09:48 2017 (1 min, 39 secs)
Time.Estimated...: Sun Oct 15 15:11:27 2017 (0 secs)
Guess.Base.......: Pipe
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 46257 H/s (53.39ms)
Recovered........: 0/53 (0.00%) Digests, 0/1 (0.00%) Salts
Progress.........: 4325376
Rejected.........: 0
Restore.Point....: 0
Candidates.#1....: aaacd1Ua -> aaaceQ3f
HWMon.Dev.#1.....: Temp: 45c Fan: 56% Util:100% Core:1759MHz Mem:3504MHz Bus:16
Session..........: hashcat
Status...........: Running
Hash.Type........: WPA/WPA2
Hash.Target......: x.hccapx
Time.Started.....: Sun Oct 15 15:09:48 2017 (1 min, 49 secs)
Time.Estimated...: Sun Oct 15 15:11:37 2017 (0 secs)
Guess.Base.......: Pipe
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 46141 H/s (53.45ms)
Recovered........: 0/53 (0.00%) Digests, 0/1 (0.00%) Salts
Progress.........: 4718592
Rejected.........: 0
Restore.Point....: 0
Candidates.#1....: aaacfGcm -> aaacgvlr
HWMon.Dev.#1.....: Temp: 45c Fan: 56% Util:100% Core:1759MHz Mem:3504MHz Bus:16
Session..........: hashcat
Status...........: Running
Hash.Type........: WPA/WPA2
Hash.Target......: x.hccapx
Time.Started.....: Sun Oct 15 15:09:48 2017 (1 min, 59 secs)
Time.Estimated...: Sun Oct 15 15:11:47 2017 (0 secs)
Guess.Base.......: Pipe
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 45603 H/s (53.51ms)
Recovered........: 0/53 (0.00%) Digests, 0/1 (0.00%) Salts
Progress.........: 5308416
Rejected.........: 0
Restore.Point....: 0
Candidates.#1....: aaach9DE -> aaaciYMJ
HWMon.Dev.#1.....: Temp: 54c Fan: 56% Util:100% Core:1746MHz Mem:3504MHz Bus:16
Session..........: hashcat
Status...........: Running
Hash.Type........: WPA/WPA2
Hash.Target......: x.hccapx
Time.Started.....: Sun Oct 15 15:09:48 2017 (2 mins, 9 secs)
Time.Estimated...: Sun Oct 15 15:11:57 2017 (0 secs)
Guess.Base.......: Pipe
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 45931 H/s (53.59ms)
Recovered........: 0/53 (0.00%) Digests, 0/1 (0.00%) Salts
Progress.........: 5701632
Rejected.........: 0
Restore.Point....: 0
Candidates.#1....: aaacjNVQ -> aaackC4V
HWMon.Dev.#1.....: Temp: 46c Fan: 56% Util:100% Core:1759MHz Mem:3504MHz Bus:16
Session..........: hashcat
Status...........: Running
Hash.Type........: WPA/WPA2
Hash.Target......: x.hccapx
Time.Started.....: Sun Oct 15 15:09:48 2017 (2 mins, 19 secs)
Time.Estimated...: Sun Oct 15 15:12:07 2017 (0 secs)
Guess.Base.......: Pipe
Speed.Dev.#1.....: 45860 H/s (53.60ms)
Recovered........: 0/53 (0.00%) Digests, 0/1 (0.00%) Salts
Progress.........: 6094848
Rejected.........: 0
Restore.Point....: 0
Candidates.#1....: aaaclsd2 -> aaacmhm7
HWMon.Dev.#1.....: Temp: 46c Fan: 56% Util:100% Core:1759MHz Mem:3504MHz Bus:16
How could you filter and save a session of following piped command followed (with -q 3 enclosed) Code: ./maskprocessor-master/src/mp64.bin -i 8:64 -1 ?l?u?d ?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1 -s aaabVSF2|/home/hp/hashcat-3.6.0/hashcat64.bin -w 3 -m 2500 x.hccapx --force
Posts: 381
Threads: 1
Joined: Aug 2014
10-16-2017, 01:31 PM
(This post was last modified: 10-16-2017, 01:32 PM by Flomac.)
(12-28-2016, 12:57 PM)marpolo Wrote: (12-07-2016, 07:01 PM)jodler303 Wrote: i personally wouldn't consider anything below 1070 but that is just my very personal humble opinion.
Hi!
Pure performance of 1070 is higher than 1060 or 1050.
But performance/price ratio may be more important.
For example here is prices from my nearest pc-shop.
gtx 1060 cost 220 usd and gtx 1070 cost 460 usd.
So cheaper to get 2x1060 and get higher h/s rate than 1x1070 could get.
I cannot confirm these prices. Te GTX1070 should start around 400 bucks. The 1060 is available in different specs, the 3GB version is ~10% slower than the 6GB version, which has been benchmarked.
Also, the GTX1060/1050 are only available with axial coolers, which makes putting two or more GPUs in one case not really a no-brainer.
|
