GTX 1050, 1060, 970 benchmarks
#1
Does anyone have benchmarks for the GTX 1050, the GTX 1060, and the GTX 970 all in one place?

I am considering additional GPUs for my rig and these are priced low, relative to the 1070 and 1080, of course.

Is the GTX 1050 even a contender for running hashcat?

What is the current optimal setup in terms of cost and performance?
Reply
#2
cheap = expensive
Reply
#3
their is yes but i dont remmber where, i shared a link to 1060 1070 1080 and gtx 970.
use the search , or look into some of my posts
Reply
#4
some 1070,1080,980,970,960,etc. benchmarks for WPA are here: http://www.crackingservice.com/?q=node/20

i personally wouldn't consider anything below 1070 but that is just my very personal humble opinion.
Reply
#5
Note, these benchmarks were made on a very old hashcat version. Results may vary extremely to todays hashcat version.
Reply
#6
(12-07-2016, 07:01 PM)jodler303 Wrote: i personally wouldn't consider anything below 1070 but that is just my very personal humble opinion.

Hi!

Pure performance of 1070 is higher than 1060 or 1050.
But performance/price ratio may be more important.
For example here is prices from my nearest pc-shop. 
gtx 1060 cost 220 usd and gtx 1070 cost 460 usd.
So cheaper to get 2x1060 and get higher h/s rate than 1x1070 could get. 


GTX 1060 benchmark is here https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-5674-po...l#pid30574
GTX 1070 benchmark is here [/url][url=https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-5440-post-30016.html#pid30016]https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-5440-post-30016.html#pid30016
both based on 3.0 version of hashcat.

It would be nice if someone could share GTX 1050 results!

Thanks!
Reply
#7
(12-28-2016, 12:57 PM)marpolo Wrote:
(12-07-2016, 07:01 PM)jodler303 Wrote: i personally wouldn't consider anything below 1070 but that is just my very personal humble opinion.

Hi!

Pure performance of 1070 is higher than 1060 or 1050.
But performance/price ratio may be more important.
For example here is prices from my nearest pc-shop. 
gtx 1060 cost 220 usd and gtx 1070 cost 460 usd.
So cheaper to get 2x1060 and get higher h/s rate than 1x1070 could get. 


GTX 1060 benchmark is here https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-5674-po...l#pid30574
GTX 1070 benchmark is here [/url][url=https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-5440-post-30016.html#pid30016]https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-5440-post-30016.html#pid30016
both based on 3.0 version of hashcat.

It would be nice if someone could share GTX 1050 results!

Thanks!

I just installed a GTX 1050 Ti today.  How do you guys share benchmark data?  just hashcat -b and paste?  Or do you include CPU and RAM info?

I'm cracking a WPA/WPA2 hash type right now at 112.8 kH/s on a 8 year old Dell Core 2 Duo at 2.13gHz.
Reply
#8
(12-29-2016, 02:51 AM)duhblow7 Wrote:
(12-28-2016, 12:57 PM)marpolo Wrote:
(12-07-2016, 07:01 PM)jodler303 Wrote: i personally wouldn't consider anything below 1070 but that is just my very personal humble opinion.

Hi!

Pure performance of 1070 is higher than 1060 or 1050.
But performance/price ratio may be more important.
For example here is prices from my nearest pc-shop. 
gtx 1060 cost 220 usd and gtx 1070 cost 460 usd.
So cheaper to get 2x1060 and get higher h/s rate than 1x1070 could get. 


GTX 1060 benchmark is here https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-5674-po...l#pid30574
GTX 1070 benchmark is here [/url][url=https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-5440-post-30016.html#pid30016]https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-5440-post-30016.html#pid30016
both based on 3.0 version of hashcat.

It would be nice if someone could share GTX 1050 results!

Thanks!

I just installed a GTX 1050 Ti today.  How do you guys share benchmark data?  just hashcat -b and paste?  Or do you include CPU and RAM info?

I'm cracking a WPA/WPA2 hash type right now at 112.8 kH/s on a 8 year old Dell Core 2 Duo at 2.13gHz.

Hi!

Thanks for 1050 TI results sharing!

Correct links now are:
GTX 1050 TI
https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-6167-po...l#pid32836

GTX 1060 benchmark is here
https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-5674-po...l#pid30574 

GTX 1070 benchmark is here
https://paste2.org/Uv1s0KBx
https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-5440-po...l#pid30016
Reply
#9
(12-28-2016, 12:57 PM)marpolo Wrote:
(12-07-2016, 07:01 PM)jodler303 Wrote: i personally wouldn't consider anything below 1070 but that is just my very personal humble opinion.

Hi!

Pure performance of 1070 is higher than 1060 or 1050.
But performance/price ratio may be more important.
For example here is prices from my nearest pc-shop. 
gtx 1060 cost 220 usd and gtx 1070 cost 460 usd.
So cheaper to get 2x1060 and get higher h/s rate than 1x1070 could get. 


GTX 1060 benchmark is here https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-5674-po...l#pid30574
GTX 1070 benchmark is here [/url][url=https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-5440-post-30016.html#pid30016]https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-5440-post-30016.html#pid30016
both based on 3.0 version of hashcat.

It would be nice if someone could share GTX 1050 results!

Thanks!

Here is

Code:
hp@hp-desktop:~$ sudo /home/hp/hashcat-3.6.0/hashcat64.bin -b -I
hashcat (v3.6.0) starting in benchmark mode...

OpenCL Info:

Platform ID #1
  Vendor  : NVIDIA Corporation
  Name    : NVIDIA CUDA
  Version : OpenCL 1.2 CUDA 9.0.194

  Device ID #1
    Type           : GPU
    Vendor ID      : 32
    Vendor         : NVIDIA Corporation
    Name           : GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
    Version        : OpenCL 1.2 CUDA
    Processor(s)   : 6
    Clock          : 1392
    Memory         : 1009/4038 MB allocatable
    OpenCL Version : OpenCL C 1.2
    Driver Version : 384.90

hp@hp-desktop:~$ sudo /home/hp/hashcat-3.6.0/hashcat64.bin -b
hashcat (v3.6.0) starting in benchmark mode...

OpenCL Platform #1: NVIDIA Corporation
======================================
* Device #1: GeForce GTX 1050 Ti, 1009/4038 MB allocatable, 6MCU

Hashtype: MD4

Speed.Dev.#1.....: 10698.0 MH/s (75.21ms)

Hashtype: MD5

Speed.Dev.#1.....:  6043.7 MH/s (66.57ms)

Hashtype: Half MD5

Speed.Dev.#1.....:  4091.5 MH/s (49.14ms)

Hashtype: SHA1

Speed.Dev.#1.....:  2293.7 MH/s (87.71ms)

Hashtype: SHA-256

Speed.Dev.#1.....:   857.7 MH/s (58.38ms)

Hashtype: SHA-384

Speed.Dev.#1.....:   267.4 MH/s (94.00ms)

Hashtype: SHA-512

Speed.Dev.#1.....:   300.3 MH/s (83.73ms)

Hashtype: SHA-3 (Keccak)

Speed.Dev.#1.....:   237.5 MH/s (52.81ms)

Hashtype: SipHash

Speed.Dev.#1.....:  8200.2 MH/s (49.04ms)

Hashtype: Skip32 (PT = $salt, key = $pass)

Speed.Dev.#1.....:  1524.0 MH/s (21.96ms)

Hashtype: RIPEMD-160

Speed.Dev.#1.....:  1357.6 MH/s (74.09ms)

Hashtype: Whirlpool

Speed.Dev.#1.....: 68231.5 kH/s (184.12ms)

Hashtype: GOST R 34.11-94

Speed.Dev.#1.....: 67436.2 kH/s (93.24ms)

Hashtype: GOST R 34.11-2012 (Streebog) 256-bit

Speed.Dev.#1.....: 13438.0 kH/s (231.29ms)

Hashtype: GOST R 34.11-2012 (Streebog) 512-bit

Speed.Dev.#1.....: 13899.3 kH/s (223.61ms)

Hashtype: DES (PT = $salt, key = $pass)

Speed.Dev.#1.....:  5667.7 MH/s (70.94ms)

Hashtype: 3DES (PT = $salt, key = $pass)

Speed.Dev.#1.....:   144.1 MH/s (87.29ms)

Hashtype: phpass, WordPress (MD5), phpBB3 (MD5), Joomla (MD5)

Speed.Dev.#1.....:  1862.2 kH/s (52.12ms)

Hashtype: scrypt

Speed.Dev.#1.....:   233.0 kH/s (54.48ms)

Hashtype: PBKDF2-HMAC-MD5

Speed.Dev.#1.....:  2033.1 kH/s (63.08ms)

Hashtype: PBKDF2-HMAC-SHA1

Speed.Dev.#1.....:   906.6 kH/s (44.65ms)

Hashtype: PBKDF2-HMAC-SHA256

Speed.Dev.#1.....:   334.0 kH/s (63.66ms)

Hashtype: PBKDF2-HMAC-SHA512

Speed.Dev.#1.....:   129.4 kH/s (88.61ms)

Hashtype: Skype

Speed.Dev.#1.....:  3581.2 MH/s (56.09ms)

Hashtype: WPA/WPA2

Speed.Dev.#1.....:   109.1 kH/s (55.99ms)

Hashtype: IKE-PSK MD5

Speed.Dev.#1.....:   537.8 MH/s (93.16ms)

Hashtype: IKE-PSK SHA1

Speed.Dev.#1.....:   226.8 MH/s (55.37ms)

Hashtype: NetNTLMv1 / NetNTLMv1+ESS

Speed.Dev.#1.....:  6152.8 MH/s (65.39ms)

Hashtype: NetNTLMv2

Speed.Dev.#1.....:   486.4 MH/s (51.69ms)

Hashtype: IPMI2 RAKP HMAC-SHA1

Speed.Dev.#1.....:   479.5 MH/s (52.44ms)

Hashtype: Kerberos 5 AS-REQ Pre-Auth etype 23

Speed.Dev.#1.....: 78690.4 kH/s (79.92ms)

Hashtype: Kerberos 5 TGS-REP etype 23

Speed.Dev.#1.....: 78866.0 kH/s (79.71ms)

Hashtype: DNSSEC (NSEC3)

Speed.Dev.#1.....:   948.3 MH/s (52.80ms)

Hashtype: PostgreSQL CRAM (MD5)

Speed.Dev.#1.....:  1909.0 MH/s (52.69ms)

Hashtype: MySQL CRAM (SHA1)

Speed.Dev.#1.....:   658.7 MH/s (76.06ms)

Hashtype: SIP digest authentication (MD5)

Speed.Dev.#1.....:   970.7 MH/s (51.57ms)

Hashtype: SMF (Simple Machines Forum) > v1.1

Speed.Dev.#1.....:  1958.6 MH/s (51.31ms)

Hashtype: vBulletin < v3.8.5

Speed.Dev.#1.....:  1912.6 MH/s (52.57ms)

Hashtype: vBulletin >= v3.8.5

Speed.Dev.#1.....:  1352.8 MH/s (74.34ms)

Hashtype: IPB2+ (Invision Power Board), MyBB 1.2+

Speed.Dev.#1.....:  1373.6 MH/s (73.25ms)

Hashtype: WBB3 (Woltlab Burning Board)

Speed.Dev.#1.....:   372.3 MH/s (67.54ms)

Hashtype: OpenCart

Speed.Dev.#1.....:   598.7 MH/s (83.67ms)

Hashtype: Joomla < 2.5.18

Speed.Dev.#1.....:  6037.9 MH/s (66.64ms)

Hashtype: PHPS

Speed.Dev.#1.....:  1935.5 MH/s (51.97ms)

Hashtype: Drupal7

Speed.Dev.#1.....:    16217 H/s (94.43ms)

Hashtype: osCommerce, xt:Commerce

Speed.Dev.#1.....:  3772.1 MH/s (53.33ms)

Hashtype: PrestaShop

Speed.Dev.#1.....:  2381.1 MH/s (84.47ms)

Hashtype: Django (SHA-1)

Speed.Dev.#1.....:  1930.6 MH/s (52.09ms)

Hashtype: Django (PBKDF2-SHA256)

Speed.Dev.#1.....:    17470 H/s (71.81ms)

Hashtype: MediaWiki B type

Speed.Dev.#1.....:  1814.4 MH/s (55.39ms)

Hashtype: Redmine

Speed.Dev.#1.....:   794.3 MH/s (63.05ms)

Hashtype: PunBB

Speed.Dev.#1.....:   783.7 MH/s (63.91ms)

Hashtype: PostgreSQL

Speed.Dev.#1.....:  6126.1 MH/s (65.65ms)

Hashtype: MSSQL (2000)

Speed.Dev.#1.....:  2345.0 MH/s (85.78ms)

Hashtype: MSSQL (2005)

Speed.Dev.#1.....:  2289.4 MH/s (87.88ms)

Hashtype: MSSQL (2012, 2014)

Speed.Dev.#1.....:   274.7 MH/s (91.46ms)

Hashtype: MySQL323

Speed.Dev.#1.....: 12782.8 MH/s (62.89ms)

Hashtype: MySQL4.1/MySQL5

Speed.Dev.#1.....:  1009.1 MH/s (49.62ms)

Hashtype: Oracle H: Type (Oracle 7+)

Speed.Dev.#1.....:   262.4 MH/s (95.84ms)

Hashtype: Oracle S: Type (Oracle 11+)

Speed.Dev.#1.....:  2208.3 MH/s (91.10ms)

Hashtype: Oracle T: Type (Oracle 12+)

Speed.Dev.#1.....:    29732 H/s (51.48ms)

Hashtype: Sybase ASE

Speed.Dev.#1.....: 74957.2 kH/s (83.89ms)

Hashtype: Episerver 6.x < .NET 4

Speed.Dev.#1.....:  1955.4 MH/s (51.44ms)

Hashtype: Episerver 6.x >= .NET 4

Speed.Dev.#1.....:   729.4 MH/s (68.68ms)

Hashtype: Apache $apr1$ MD5, md5apr1, MD5 (APR)

Speed.Dev.#1.....:  2862.7 kH/s (67.50ms)

Hashtype: ColdFusion 10+

Speed.Dev.#1.....:   485.4 MH/s (51.77ms)

Hashtype: hMailServer

Speed.Dev.#1.....:   762.1 MH/s (65.74ms)

Hashtype: nsldap, SHA-1(Base64), Netscape LDAP SHA

Speed.Dev.#1.....:  2259.4 MH/s (89.04ms)

Hashtype: nsldaps, SSHA-1(Base64), Netscape LDAP SSHA

Speed.Dev.#1.....:  2301.3 MH/s (87.41ms)

Hashtype: SSHA-256(Base64), LDAP {SSHA256}

Speed.Dev.#1.....:   852.1 MH/s (58.75ms)

Hashtype: SSHA-512(Base64), LDAP {SSHA512}

Speed.Dev.#1.....:   286.7 MH/s (87.68ms)

Hashtype: LM

Speed.Dev.#1.....:  5660.6 MH/s (71.02ms)

Hashtype: NTLM

Speed.Dev.#1.....: 10465.7 MH/s (76.88ms)

Hashtype: Domain Cached Credentials (DCC), MS Cache

Speed.Dev.#1.....:  3035.9 MH/s (66.25ms)

Hashtype: Domain Cached Credentials 2 (DCC2), MS Cache 2

Speed.Dev.#1.....:    93667 H/s (51.34ms)

Hashtype: DPAPI masterkey file v1 and v2

Speed.Dev.#1.....:    20129 H/s (51.93ms)

Hashtype: MS-AzureSync PBKDF2-HMAC-SHA256

Speed.Dev.#1.....:  2940.0 kH/s (54.81ms)

Hashtype: descrypt, DES (Unix), Traditional DES

Speed.Dev.#1.....:   272.9 MH/s (92.01ms)

Hashtype: BSDi Crypt, Extended DES

Speed.Dev.#1.....:   420.8 kH/s (77.36ms)

Hashtype: md5crypt, MD5 (Unix), Cisco-IOS $1$ (MD5)

Speed.Dev.#1.....:  2969.0 kH/s (65.11ms)

Hashtype: bcrypt $2*$, Blowfish (Unix)

Speed.Dev.#1.....:     4104 H/s (45.67ms)

Hashtype: sha256crypt $5$, SHA256 (Unix)

Speed.Dev.#1.....:   110.5 kH/s (88.16ms)

Hashtype: sha512crypt $6$, SHA512 (Unix)

Speed.Dev.#1.....:    44992 H/s (55.15ms)

Hashtype: OSX v10.4, OSX v10.5, OSX v10.6

Speed.Dev.#1.....:  1939.3 MH/s (51.87ms)

Hashtype: OSX v10.7

Speed.Dev.#1.....:   265.1 MH/s (94.90ms)

Hashtype: OSX v10.8+ (PBKDF2-SHA512)

Speed.Dev.#1.....:     3622 H/s (49.12ms)

Hashtype: AIX {smd5}

Speed.Dev.#1.....:  2995.5 kH/s (64.60ms)

Hashtype: AIX {ssha1}

Speed.Dev.#1.....: 13343.8 kH/s (51.90ms)

Hashtype: AIX {ssha256}

Speed.Dev.#1.....:  4954.5 kH/s (74.50ms)

Hashtype: AIX {ssha512}

Speed.Dev.#1.....:  1893.6 kH/s (48.82ms)

Hashtype: Cisco-PIX MD5

Speed.Dev.#1.....:  4547.7 MH/s (88.50ms)

Hashtype: Cisco-ASA MD5

Speed.Dev.#1.....:  4551.7 MH/s (88.38ms)

Hashtype: Cisco-IOS type 4 (SHA256)

Speed.Dev.#1.....:   885.2 MH/s (56.59ms)

Hashtype: Cisco-IOS $8$ (PBKDF2-SHA256)

Speed.Dev.#1.....:    17456 H/s (71.91ms)

Hashtype: Cisco-IOS $9$ (scrypt)

Speed.Dev.#1.....:     5357 H/s (1431.75ms)

Hashtype: Juniper NetScreen/SSG (ScreenOS)

Speed.Dev.#1.....:  3742.3 MH/s (53.72ms)

Hashtype: Juniper IVE

Speed.Dev.#1.....:  2947.7 kH/s (65.65ms)

Hashtype: Samsung Android Password/PIN

Speed.Dev.#1.....:  1572.9 kH/s (61.95ms)

Hashtype: Citrix NetScaler

Speed.Dev.#1.....:  2067.9 MH/s (48.63ms)

Hashtype: RACF

Speed.Dev.#1.....:   704.2 MH/s (71.42ms)

Hashtype: GRUB 2

Speed.Dev.#1.....:    12762 H/s (49.10ms)

Hashtype: Radmin2

Speed.Dev.#1.....:  2268.0 MH/s (88.69ms)

Hashtype: SAP CODVN B (BCODE)

Speed.Dev.#1.....:   674.9 MH/s (74.18ms)

Hashtype: SAP CODVN F/G (PASSCODE)

Speed.Dev.#1.....:   322.1 MH/s (78.03ms)

Hashtype: SAP CODVN H (PWDSALTEDHASH) iSSHA-1

Speed.Dev.#1.....:  1727.8 kH/s (56.28ms)

Hashtype: Lotus Notes/Domino 5

Speed.Dev.#1.....: 60821.7 kH/s (103.41ms)

Hashtype: Lotus Notes/Domino 6

Speed.Dev.#1.....: 19998.8 kH/s (78.61ms)

Hashtype: Lotus Notes/Domino 8

Speed.Dev.#1.....:   186.6 kH/s (52.14ms)

Hashtype: PeopleSoft

Speed.Dev.#1.....:  2317.7 MH/s (86.81ms)

Hashtype: PeopleSoft PS_TOKEN

Speed.Dev.#1.....:   871.1 MH/s (57.50ms)

Hashtype: 7-Zip

Speed.Dev.#1.....:     2715 H/s (70.60ms)

Hashtype: WinZip

Speed.Dev.#1.....:   302.7 kH/s (70.55ms)

Hashtype: RAR3-hp

Speed.Dev.#1.....:    10090 H/s (75.99ms)

Hashtype: RAR5

Speed.Dev.#1.....:    10385 H/s (73.78ms)

Hashtype: AxCrypt

Speed.Dev.#1.....:    32222 H/s (155.36ms)

Hashtype: AxCrypt in-memory SHA1

Speed.Dev.#1.....:  2175.7 MH/s (92.47ms)

Hashtype: TrueCrypt PBKDF2-HMAC-RIPEMD160 + XTS 512 bit

Speed.Dev.#1.....:    77802 H/s (74.89ms)

Hashtype: TrueCrypt PBKDF2-HMAC-SHA512 + XTS 512 bit

Speed.Dev.#1.....:   119.0 kH/s (89.50ms)

Hashtype: TrueCrypt PBKDF2-HMAC-Whirlpool + XTS 512 bit

Speed.Dev.#1.....:    10012 H/s (151.67ms)

Hashtype: TrueCrypt PBKDF2-HMAC-RIPEMD160 + XTS 512 bit + boot-mode

Speed.Dev.#1.....:   149.4 kH/s (68.33ms)

Hashtype: VeraCrypt PBKDF2-HMAC-RIPEMD160 + XTS 512 bit

Speed.Dev.#1.....:      217 H/s (77.76ms)

Hashtype: VeraCrypt PBKDF2-HMAC-SHA512 + XTS 512 bit

Speed.Dev.#1.....:      249 H/s (48.82ms)

Hashtype: VeraCrypt PBKDF2-HMAC-Whirlpool + XTS 512 bit

Speed.Dev.#1.....:        0 H/s (151.49ms)

Hashtype: VeraCrypt PBKDF2-HMAC-RIPEMD160 + XTS 512 bit + boot-mode

Speed.Dev.#1.....:      491 H/s (76.80ms)

Hashtype: VeraCrypt PBKDF2-HMAC-SHA256 + XTS 512 bit

Speed.Dev.#1.....:      310 H/s (76.27ms)

Hashtype: VeraCrypt PBKDF2-HMAC-SHA256 + XTS 512 bit + boot-mode

Speed.Dev.#1.....:      801 H/s (76.80ms)

Hashtype: Android FDE <= 4.3

Speed.Dev.#1.....:   233.2 kH/s (51.85ms)

Hashtype: Android FDE (Samsung DEK)

Speed.Dev.#1.....:    83722 H/s (72.98ms)

Hashtype: eCryptfs

Speed.Dev.#1.....:     3897 H/s (48.73ms)

Hashtype: MS Office <= 2003 $0/$1, MD5 + RC4

Speed.Dev.#1.....: 71987.1 kH/s (87.33ms)

Hashtype: MS Office <= 2003 $0/$1, MD5 + RC4, collider #1

Speed.Dev.#1.....: 89411.7 kH/s (70.32ms)

Hashtype: MS Office <= 2003 $3/$4, SHA1 + RC4

Speed.Dev.#1.....: 87011.5 kH/s (72.26ms)

Hashtype: MS Office <= 2003 $3, SHA1 + RC4, collider #1

Speed.Dev.#1.....: 95633.7 kH/s (65.70ms)

Hashtype: MS Office 2007

Speed.Dev.#1.....:    37795 H/s (53.19ms)

Hashtype: MS Office 2010

Speed.Dev.#1.....:    18778 H/s (53.47ms)

Hashtype: MS Office 2013

Speed.Dev.#1.....:     2586 H/s (96.58ms)

Hashtype: PDF 1.1 - 1.3 (Acrobat 2 - 4)

Speed.Dev.#1.....: 98785.6 kH/s (63.61ms)

Hashtype: PDF 1.1 - 1.3 (Acrobat 2 - 4), collider #1

Speed.Dev.#1.....:   110.2 MH/s (57.02ms)

Hashtype: PDF 1.4 - 1.6 (Acrobat 5 - 8)

Speed.Dev.#1.....:  4767.0 kH/s (39.94ms)

Hashtype: PDF 1.7 Level 3 (Acrobat 9)

Speed.Dev.#1.....:   875.8 MH/s (57.20ms)

Hashtype: PDF 1.7 Level 8 (Acrobat 10 - 11)

Speed.Dev.#1.....:    11784 H/s (217.10ms)

Hashtype: Password Safe v2

Speed.Dev.#1.....:    91821 H/s (42.19ms)

Hashtype: Password Safe v3

Speed.Dev.#1.....:   343.2 kH/s (64.91ms)

Hashtype: LastPass + LastPass sniffed

Speed.Dev.#1.....:   656.4 kH/s (54.64ms)

Hashtype: 1Password, agilekeychain

Speed.Dev.#1.....:   951.4 kH/s (50.91ms)

Hashtype: 1Password, cloudkeychain

Speed.Dev.#1.....:     3132 H/s (49.63ms)

Hashtype: Bitcoin/Litecoin wallet.dat

Speed.Dev.#1.....:     1276 H/s (48.31ms)

Hashtype: Blockchain, My Wallet

Speed.Dev.#1.....: 22679.1 kH/s (17.00ms)

Hashtype: Blockchain, My Wallet, V2

Speed.Dev.#1.....:    95245 H/s (51.43ms)

Hashtype: KeePass 1 (AES/Twofish) and KeePass 2 (AES)

Speed.Dev.#1.....:    38223 H/s (219.19ms)

Hashtype: JKS Java Key Store Private Keys (SHA1)

Speed.Dev.#1.....:  2094.1 MH/s (47.94ms)

Hashtype: Ethereum Wallet, PBKDF2-HMAC-SHA256

Speed.Dev.#1.....:     1271 H/s (74.88ms)

Hashtype: ArubaOS

Speed.Dev.#1.....:  1848.9 MH/s (54.38ms)

Hashtype: ChaCha20

Speed.Dev.#1.....:  1271.1 MH/s (79.07ms)
But if you pipe in maskprocessor, this would be your rates
Code:
hp@hp-desktop:~$ ./maskprocessor-master/src/mp64.bin -i 8:64 -1 ?l?u?d ?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1 -s aaabVSF2|/home/hp/hashcat-3.6.0/hashcat64.bin -w 3 -m 2500 x.hccapx --force
hashcat (v3.6.0) starting...

OpenCL Platform #1: NVIDIA Corporation
======================================
* Device #1: GeForce GTX 1050 Ti, 1009/4038 MB allocatable, 6MCU

Hashes: 78 digests; 53 unique digests, 1 unique salts
Bitmaps: 16 bits, 65536 entries, 0x0000ffff mask, 262144 bytes, 5/13 rotates
Rules: 1

Applicable optimizers:
* Zero-Byte
* Single-Salt
* Slow-Hash-SIMD

Watchdog: Temperature abort trigger set to 90c
Watchdog: Temperature retain trigger disabled.

Starting attack in stdin mode...

Session..........: hashcat
Status...........: Running
Hash.Type........: WPA/WPA2
Hash.Target......: x.hccapx
Time.Started.....: Sun Oct 15 15:09:48 2017 (9 secs)
Time.Estimated...: Sun Oct 15 15:09:57 2017 (0 secs)
Guess.Base.......: Pipe
Speed.Dev.#1.....:    65135 H/s (52.77ms)
Recovered........: 0/53 (0.00%) Digests, 0/1 (0.00%) Salts
Progress.........: 196608
Rejected.........: 0
Restore.Point....: 0
Candidates.#1....: aaabWHO8 -> aaabXwYd
HWMon.Dev.#1.....: Temp: 34c Fan: 56% Util:100% Core:1771MHz Mem:3504MHz Bus:16

Session..........: hashcat
Status...........: Running
Hash.Type........: WPA/WPA2
Hash.Target......: x.hccapx
Time.Started.....: Sun Oct 15 15:09:48 2017 (19 secs)
Time.Estimated...: Sun Oct 15 15:10:07 2017 (0 secs)
Guess.Base.......: Pipe
Speed.Dev.#1.....:    49365 H/s (53.05ms)
Recovered........: 0/53 (0.00%) Digests, 0/1 (0.00%) Salts
Progress.........: 786432
Rejected.........: 0
Restore.Point....: 0
Candidates.#1....: aaabZbgq -> aaabZ0pv
HWMon.Dev.#1.....: Temp: 44c Fan: 56% Util:100% Core:1759MHz Mem:3504MHz Bus:16

Session..........: hashcat
Status...........: Running
Hash.Type........: WPA/WPA2
Hash.Target......: x.hccapx
Time.Started.....: Sun Oct 15 15:09:48 2017 (29 secs)
Time.Estimated...: Sun Oct 15 15:10:17 2017 (0 secs)
Guess.Base.......: Pipe
Speed.Dev.#1.....:    49563 H/s (53.22ms)
Recovered........: 0/53 (0.00%) Digests, 0/1 (0.00%) Salts
Progress.........: 1179648
Rejected.........: 0
Restore.Point....: 0
Candidates.#1....: aaab0PyC -> aaab1EHH
HWMon.Dev.#1.....: Temp: 38c Fan: 56% Util:100% Core:1759MHz Mem:3504MHz Bus:16

Session..........: hashcat
Status...........: Running
Hash.Type........: WPA/WPA2
Hash.Target......: x.hccapx
Time.Started.....: Sun Oct 15 15:09:48 2017 (39 secs)
Time.Estimated...: Sun Oct 15 15:10:27 2017 (0 secs)
Guess.Base.......: Pipe
Speed.Dev.#1.....:    48440 H/s (53.51ms)
Recovered........: 0/53 (0.00%) Digests, 0/1 (0.00%) Salts
Progress.........: 1572864
Rejected.........: 0
Restore.Point....: 0
Candidates.#1....: aaab2tQO -> aaab3iZT
HWMon.Dev.#1.....: Temp: 39c Fan: 56% Util:100% Core:1759MHz Mem:3504MHz Bus:16

Session..........: hashcat
Status...........: Running
Hash.Type........: WPA/WPA2
Hash.Target......: x.hccapx
Time.Started.....: Sun Oct 15 15:09:48 2017 (49 secs)
Time.Estimated...: Sun Oct 15 15:10:37 2017 (0 secs)
Guess.Base.......: Pipe
Speed.Dev.#1.....:    45820 H/s (53.57ms)
Recovered........: 0/53 (0.00%) Digests, 0/1 (0.00%) Salts
Progress.........: 2162688
Rejected.........: 0
Restore.Point....: 0
Candidates.#1....: aaab4Xh6 -> aaab5Mrb
HWMon.Dev.#1.....: Temp: 48c Fan: 56% Util:100% Core:1759MHz Mem:3504MHz Bus:16

Session..........: hashcat
Status...........: Running
Hash.Type........: WPA/WPA2
Hash.Target......: x.hccapx
Time.Started.....: Sun Oct 15 15:09:48 2017 (59 secs)
Time.Estimated...: Sun Oct 15 15:10:47 2017 (0 secs)
Guess.Base.......: Pipe
Speed.Dev.#1.....:    47068 H/s (53.42ms)
Recovered........: 0/53 (0.00%) Digests, 0/1 (0.00%) Salts
Progress.........: 2555904
Rejected.........: 0
Restore.Point....: 0
Candidates.#1....: aaab6BAi -> aaab7qJn
HWMon.Dev.#1.....: Temp: 43c Fan: 56% Util:100% Core:1759MHz Mem:3504MHz Bus:16

Session..........: hashcat
Status...........: Running
Hash.Type........: WPA/WPA2
Hash.Target......: x.hccapx
Time.Started.....: Sun Oct 15 15:09:48 2017 (1 min, 9 secs)
Time.Estimated...: Sun Oct 15 15:10:57 2017 (0 secs)
Guess.Base.......: Pipe
Speed.Dev.#1.....:    46819 H/s (53.34ms)
Recovered........: 0/53 (0.00%) Digests, 0/1 (0.00%) Salts
Progress.........: 2949120
Rejected.........: 0
Restore.Point....: 0
Candidates.#1....: aaab8fSu -> aaab841z
HWMon.Dev.#1.....: Temp: 42c Fan: 56% Util:100% Core:1759MHz Mem:3504MHz Bus:16

Session..........: hashcat
Status...........: Running
Hash.Type........: WPA/WPA2
Hash.Target......: x.hccapx
Time.Started.....: Sun Oct 15 15:09:48 2017 (1 min, 19 secs)
Time.Estimated...: Sun Oct 15 15:11:07 2017 (0 secs)
Guess.Base.......: Pipe
Speed.Dev.#1.....:    45225 H/s (53.47ms)
Recovered........: 0/53 (0.00%) Digests, 0/1 (0.00%) Salts
Progress.........: 3538944
Rejected.........: 0
Restore.Point....: 0
Candidates.#1....: aaacaJjM -> aaacbysR
HWMon.Dev.#1.....: Temp: 49c Fan: 56% Util: 99% Core:1759MHz Mem:3504MHz Bus:16

Session..........: hashcat
Status...........: Running
Hash.Type........: WPA/WPA2
Hash.Target......: x.hccapx
Time.Started.....: Sun Oct 15 15:09:48 2017 (1 min, 29 secs)
Time.Estimated...: Sun Oct 15 15:11:17 2017 (0 secs)
Guess.Base.......: Pipe
Speed.Dev.#1.....:    46205 H/s (53.47ms)
Recovered........: 0/53 (0.00%) Digests, 0/1 (0.00%) Salts
Progress.........: 3932160
Rejected.........: 0
Restore.Point....: 0
Candidates.#1....: aaaccnBY -> aaacdcK3
HWMon.Dev.#1.....: Temp: 52c Fan: 56% Util:100% Core:1746MHz Mem:3504MHz Bus:16

Session..........: hashcat
Status...........: Running
Hash.Type........: WPA/WPA2
Hash.Target......: x.hccapx
Time.Started.....: Sun Oct 15 15:09:48 2017 (1 min, 39 secs)
Time.Estimated...: Sun Oct 15 15:11:27 2017 (0 secs)
Guess.Base.......: Pipe
Speed.Dev.#1.....:    46257 H/s (53.39ms)
Recovered........: 0/53 (0.00%) Digests, 0/1 (0.00%) Salts
Progress.........: 4325376
Rejected.........: 0
Restore.Point....: 0
Candidates.#1....: aaacd1Ua -> aaaceQ3f
HWMon.Dev.#1.....: Temp: 45c Fan: 56% Util:100% Core:1759MHz Mem:3504MHz Bus:16

Session..........: hashcat
Status...........: Running
Hash.Type........: WPA/WPA2
Hash.Target......: x.hccapx
Time.Started.....: Sun Oct 15 15:09:48 2017 (1 min, 49 secs)
Time.Estimated...: Sun Oct 15 15:11:37 2017 (0 secs)
Guess.Base.......: Pipe
Speed.Dev.#1.....:    46141 H/s (53.45ms)
Recovered........: 0/53 (0.00%) Digests, 0/1 (0.00%) Salts
Progress.........: 4718592
Rejected.........: 0
Restore.Point....: 0
Candidates.#1....: aaacfGcm -> aaacgvlr
HWMon.Dev.#1.....: Temp: 45c Fan: 56% Util:100% Core:1759MHz Mem:3504MHz Bus:16

Session..........: hashcat
Status...........: Running
Hash.Type........: WPA/WPA2
Hash.Target......: x.hccapx
Time.Started.....: Sun Oct 15 15:09:48 2017 (1 min, 59 secs)
Time.Estimated...: Sun Oct 15 15:11:47 2017 (0 secs)
Guess.Base.......: Pipe
Speed.Dev.#1.....:    45603 H/s (53.51ms)
Recovered........: 0/53 (0.00%) Digests, 0/1 (0.00%) Salts
Progress.........: 5308416
Rejected.........: 0
Restore.Point....: 0
Candidates.#1....: aaach9DE -> aaaciYMJ
HWMon.Dev.#1.....: Temp: 54c Fan: 56% Util:100% Core:1746MHz Mem:3504MHz Bus:16

Session..........: hashcat
Status...........: Running
Hash.Type........: WPA/WPA2
Hash.Target......: x.hccapx
Time.Started.....: Sun Oct 15 15:09:48 2017 (2 mins, 9 secs)
Time.Estimated...: Sun Oct 15 15:11:57 2017 (0 secs)
Guess.Base.......: Pipe
Speed.Dev.#1.....:    45931 H/s (53.59ms)
Recovered........: 0/53 (0.00%) Digests, 0/1 (0.00%) Salts
Progress.........: 5701632
Rejected.........: 0
Restore.Point....: 0
Candidates.#1....: aaacjNVQ -> aaackC4V
HWMon.Dev.#1.....: Temp: 46c Fan: 56% Util:100% Core:1759MHz Mem:3504MHz Bus:16

Session..........: hashcat
Status...........: Running
Hash.Type........: WPA/WPA2
Hash.Target......: x.hccapx
Time.Started.....: Sun Oct 15 15:09:48 2017 (2 mins, 19 secs)
Time.Estimated...: Sun Oct 15 15:12:07 2017 (0 secs)
Guess.Base.......: Pipe
Speed.Dev.#1.....:    45860 H/s (53.60ms)
Recovered........: 0/53 (0.00%) Digests, 0/1 (0.00%) Salts
Progress.........: 6094848
Rejected.........: 0
Restore.Point....: 0
Candidates.#1....: aaaclsd2 -> aaacmhm7
HWMon.Dev.#1.....: Temp: 46c Fan: 56% Util:100% Core:1759MHz Mem:3504MHz Bus:16


How could you filter and save a session of following piped command followed (with -q 3 enclosed)
Code:
./maskprocessor-master/src/mp64.bin -i 8:64 -1 ?l?u?d ?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1 -s aaabVSF2|/home/hp/hashcat-3.6.0/hashcat64.bin -w 3 -m 2500 x.hccapx --force
Reply
#10
(12-28-2016, 12:57 PM)marpolo Wrote:
(12-07-2016, 07:01 PM)jodler303 Wrote: i personally wouldn't consider anything below 1070 but that is just my very personal humble opinion.

Hi!

Pure performance of 1070 is higher than 1060 or 1050.
But performance/price ratio may be more important.
For example here is prices from my nearest pc-shop. 
gtx 1060 cost 220 usd and gtx 1070 cost 460 usd.
So cheaper to get 2x1060 and get higher h/s rate than 1x1070 could get.

I cannot confirm these prices. Te GTX1070 should start around 400 bucks. The 1060 is available in different specs, the 3GB version is ~10% slower than the 6GB version, which has been benchmarked.

Also, the GTX1060/1050 are only available with axial coolers, which makes putting two or more GPUs in one case not really a no-brainer.
Reply