That are some good news.
Well, UBUNTU is recommended by hashcat team and is an easy to use distribution. I share that opinion. Designed for complete novices, UBUNTU teaches a beginner everything he need to know to enjoy Linux. He will get help in the forums (https://ubuntuforums.org/) and here, too.
Nevertheless, I prefer Arch Linux, because it does exactly what I configured. But I really do not understand, why so many novices run K*A*L*I. That is an extremely stripped down version of Debian and not usable for novices.
The same applies for using hcxdumptool/hcxtools/hcxkeys. This tools are designed to perform analysis and to find weak points (like the PMKID attack vector) in combination with a hashcracker (hashcat) and a database (wpa-sec). Goal is not to crack a single PSK! Goal is to find the weak point within the system! So this tools are completely different to aircrack-ng. If ‎someone needs a script of 1491 lines (as of today) to put his device into monitor mode, he shouldn't use hcxtools!
Well, UBUNTU is recommended by hashcat team and is an easy to use distribution. I share that opinion. Designed for complete novices, UBUNTU teaches a beginner everything he need to know to enjoy Linux. He will get help in the forums (https://ubuntuforums.org/) and here, too.
Nevertheless, I prefer Arch Linux, because it does exactly what I configured. But I really do not understand, why so many novices run K*A*L*I. That is an extremely stripped down version of Debian and not usable for novices.
The same applies for using hcxdumptool/hcxtools/hcxkeys. This tools are designed to perform analysis and to find weak points (like the PMKID attack vector) in combination with a hashcracker (hashcat) and a database (wpa-sec). Goal is not to crack a single PSK! Goal is to find the weak point within the system! So this tools are completely different to aircrack-ng. If ‎someone needs a script of 1491 lines (as of today) to put his device into monitor mode, he shouldn't use hcxtools!