hashcat
advanced password recovery

A little too early, but here it is to talk about it:
Would like to know if oclhashcat will support this
little monster. Will be much faster than 5970 ? How much
faster (estimations)? Worth to wait ? The price sounds a
good option, considering a possible system with crossfire
(2x6990) ?

Here you can see GPU speed estimations for MD5/SHA1/Office 2007/WPA/WinZip/SL3, add official specifications and you'll see an approximate result

note this table have not been updated yet. it shows an 750mhz clock rate for the 6990 while it actually runs on 830mhz by default.

oh and i am sure it will break 10B mark in md5 with new oclHashcat lite

(03-10-2011, 11:15 AM)atom Wrote: oh and i am sure it will break 10B mark in md5 with new oclHashcat lite

... and more if they are 2x6990, at least.
We know that some people make systems with 4x5970,
so, for sure, they will try 4x6990 or even higher configurations.

(03-10-2011, 11:15 AM)atom Wrote: note this table have not been updated yet. it shows an 750mhz clock rate for the 6990 while it actually runs on 830mhz by default.

Hello Ivan,

Where does one obtain a copy of oclhashcat lite? Also what Algo's does this version support? It seems ATI has not yet released a Linux driver yet but atleast their is an early release version for Windows. Talk to you later.

oclHashcat-lite is not yet public, but it will support the following formats:

0 = MD5 200 = MySQL
1 = md5($pass.$salt) 300 = MySQL4.1/MySQL5
3 = md5(md5($pass)) 900 = MD4
5 = vBulletin 1000 = NTLM
100 = SHA1 1100 = Domain Cached Credentials
101 = sha1($pass.$salt) 1400 = SHA256

(03-15-2011, 10:27 AM)atom Wrote: oclHashcat-lite is not yet public, but it will support the following formats:

0 = MD5 200 = MySQL
1 = md5($pass.$salt) 300 = MySQL4.1/MySQL5
3 = md5(md5($pass)) 900 = MD4
5 = vBulletin 1000 = NTLM
100 = SHA1 1100 = Domain Cached Credentials
101 = sha1($pass.$salt) 1400 = SHA256

Hello Atom,

Please do not leave out the following two associated algos. Also has the keyspace been expanded on the following release? Ie what will be the maximum number of characters one can brute force when running (-1 ?l?u?d?s 11111111111111111) with any of the algo's? Also can you confirm that the following version will be based of the last V0.26b of oclhashcat? Lastly will the --increment -pos feature be restored?

sha1($salt.$pass)
md5($salt.$pass)

Thank you

the keyspace has increased. max plaintext size is exactly (inclusive) 15. even on unicode algorithms like DCC and NTLM. in case its a salted algo (1 and 101), the salt can be of any size BUT the sum of the length of the plaintext and the salt can not exceed the 48. oclHashcat-lite comes directly for oclHashcat 0.26b which does not have --increment but --pw-min and --pw-max (more easy) and is also able to do restore or in short: its the perfect cracker also take a look at http://www.sch0.org

(03-15-2011, 09:55 PM)atom Wrote: the keyspace has increased. max plaintext size is exactly (inclusive) 15. even on unicode algorithms like DCC and NTLM. in case its a salted algo (1 and 101), the salt can be of any size BUT the sum of the length of the plaintext and the salt can not exceed the 48. oclHashcat-lite comes directly for oclHashcat 0.26b which does not have --increment but --pw-min and --pw-max (more easy) and is also able to do restore or in short: its the perfect cracker also take a look at http://www.sch0.org

This should be a great update. What of the following additional algo's for the lite edition?
sha1($salt.$pass)
md5($salt.$pass)

Also what is the process of performing a restore with 0.26b? Can you provide an example on the command issued to resume?

Thank you