09-03-2013, 01:41 PM
... contains the first ported oclHashcat-lite kernels for mode 0, 900 and 1000 for both AMD and NV.
happy testing!!
happy testing!!
v1.00 beta 11 ...
|
09-03-2013, 01:41 PM
... contains the first ported oclHashcat-lite kernels for mode 0, 900 and 1000 for both AMD and NV.
happy testing!!
09-03-2013, 02:38 PM
(09-03-2013, 01:41 PM)atom Wrote: ... contains the first ported oclHashcat-lite kernels for mode 0, 900 and 1000 for both AMD and NV.Ok. A bit more info is welcomed. Does it trigger these kernels by itself when there is only 1 hash left AND that the attack is bruteforcing? Otherwise, it's just that you plan to use it as lite and design the command-line accordingly?
09-03-2013, 02:48 PM
Yes, when you use only 1 hash and brute-force mode
09-06-2013, 06:17 AM
crashes for me if i have single hash in hast.list, but works ok if i use the examp0.hash list
root@crack-3:~/oclHashcat-1.00# ./oclHashcat64.bin example0.hash example.dict oclHashcat, advanced password recovery Hashes: 6494 total, 1 unique salts, 6494 unique digests Bitmaps: 16 bits, 65536 entries, 0x0000ffff mask, 262144 bytes Rules: 1 Workload: 256 loops, 80 accel Applicable Optimizers: * Zero-Bits * Precompute-Init * Precompute-Merkle-Demgard * Meet-In-The-Middle * Early-Skip * Not-Salted * Not-Iterated * Single-Salt Watchdog: Temperature abort trigger set to 90c Watchdog: Temperature retain trigger set to 80c Device #1: Cypress, 512MB, 725Mhz, 20MCU Device #2: Cypress, 512MB, 725Mhz, 20MCU Device #3: Cypress, 512MB, 725Mhz, 20MCU Device #4: Cypress, 512MB, 725Mhz, 20MCU Device #5: Cypress, 512MB, 725Mhz, 20MCU Device #6: Cypress, 512MB, 725Mhz, 20MCU Device #1: Kernel ./kernels/4098/m0000_a0.Cypress_1084.4_1084.4.kernel not found in cache! Building may take a while... Device #1: Kernel ./kernels/4098/m0000_a0.Cypress_1084.4_1084.4.kernel (1721904 bytes) Device #1: Kernel ./kernels/4098/bzero.Cypress_1084.4_1084.4.kernel not found in cache! Building may take a while... Device #1: Kernel ./kernels/4098/bzero.Cypress_1084.4_1084.4.kernel (65332 bytes) Device #2: Kernel ./kernels/4098/m0000_a0.Cypress_1084.4_1084.4.kernel (1721904 bytes) Device #2: Kernel ./kernels/4098/bzero.Cypress_1084.4_1084.4.kernel (65332 bytes) Device #3: Kernel ./kernels/4098/m0000_a0.Cypress_1084.4_1084.4.kernel (1721904 bytes) Device #3: Kernel ./kernels/4098/bzero.Cypress_1084.4_1084.4.kernel (65332 bytes) Device #4: Kernel ./kernels/4098/m0000_a0.Cypress_1084.4_1084.4.kernel (1721904 bytes) Device #4: Kernel ./kernels/4098/bzero.Cypress_1084.4_1084.4.kernel (65332 bytes) Device #5: Kernel ./kernels/4098/m0000_a0.Cypress_1084.4_1084.4.kernel (1721904 bytes) Device #5: Kernel ./kernels/4098/bzero.Cypress_1084.4_1084.4.kernel (65332 bytes) Device #6: Kernel ./kernels/4098/m0000_a0.Cypress_1084.4_1084.4.kernel (1721904 bytes) Device #6: Kernel ./kernels/4098/bzero.Cypress_1084.4_1084.4.kernel (65332 bytes) WARN: ADL_Overdrive5_FanSpeedInfo_Get(): -1 Generated dictionary stats for example.dict: 1210228 bytes, 129988 words, 129988 keyspace NOTE: autotuned --gpu-accel from 80 to 8 e11c594e6a2f4eb499cceadfca988595:13LEXON Session.Name...: oclHashcat Status.........: Exhausted Input.Mode.....: File (example.dict) Hash.Target....: File (example0.hash) Hash.Type......: MD5 Time.Started...: 0 secs Time.Estimated.: 0 secs Speed.GPU.#1...: 4656.2 kH/s Speed.GPU.#2...: 10417.5 kH/s Speed.GPU.#3...: 8864.5 kH/s Speed.GPU.#4...: 0 H/s Speed.GPU.#5...: 0 H/s Speed.GPU.#6...: 0 H/s Speed.GPU.#*...: 23938.2 kH/s Recovered......: 1/6494 (0.02%) Digests, 0/1 (0.00%) Salts Progress.......: 129988/129988 (100.00%) Rejected.......: 0/129988 (0.00%) HWMon.GPU.#1...: 0% Util, 53c Temp, N/A Fan HWMon.GPU.#2...: 0% Util, 54c Temp, N/A Fan HWMon.GPU.#3...: 0% Util, 54c Temp, N/A Fan HWMon.GPU.#4...: 0% Util, 55c Temp, N/A Fan HWMon.GPU.#5...: 0% Util, 56c Temp, N/A Fan HWMon.GPU.#6...: 0% Util, 54c Temp, N/A Fan Started: Thu Sep 5 21:12:26 2013 Stopped: Thu Sep 5 21:12:44 2013 root@crack-3:~/oclHashcat-1.00# echo e11c594e6a2f4eb499cceadfca988595 > test.md5 root@crack-3:~/oclHashcat-1.00# ./oclHashcat64.bin test.md5 example.dict oclHashcat v1.00 starting... Hashes: 1 total, 1 unique salts, 1 unique digests Bitmaps: 8 bits, 256 entries, 0x000000ff mask, 1024 bytes Rules: 1 Workload: 256 loops, 80 accel Applicable Optimizers: * Zero-Bits * Precompute-Init * Precompute-Merkle-Demgard * Meet-In-The-Middle * Early-Skip * Not-Salted * Not-Iterated * Single-Hash * Single-Salt Watchdog: Temperature abort trigger set to 90c Watchdog: Temperature retain trigger set to 80c Device #1: Cypress, 512MB, 725Mhz, 20MCU Device #2: Cypress, 512MB, 725Mhz, 20MCU Device #3: Cypress, 512MB, 725Mhz, 20MCU Device #4: Cypress, 512MB, 725Mhz, 20MCU Device #5: Cypress, 512MB, 725Mhz, 20MCU Device #6: Cypress, 512MB, 725Mhz, 20MCU Device #1: Kernel ./kernels/4098/m0000_a0.Cypress_1084.4_1084.4.kernel (1721904 bytes) Device #1: Kernel ./kernels/4098/bzero.Cypress_1084.4_1084.4.kernel (65332 bytes) ERROR: clCreateKernel() -46 root@crack-3:~/oclHashcat-1.00#
09-06-2013, 10:03 AM
OK, I will fix this, but the difference is only to see in brute-force as oclHashcat-lite is a brute-force only cracker. So you will only see a difference with single MD5 and NTLM hashes in brute-force. Also, please don't call it a crash when it's not
09-06-2013, 10:09 AM
ERROR: clCreateKernel() -46 will be fixed in b16
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|